2007 PLP 1905 (SCMR)
GUL KHITAB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1905 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan and Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, JJ |
| Parties | GUL KHITAB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1905 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1905 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan and Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1905 (SCMR) (GUL KHITAB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Niaz Ahmed Rathore, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 24th April, 2006.
- M. Saeed Khan, Additional Advocate-General for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 29-10-2003 passed by Peshawar High Court., Peshawar, in Criminal Appeal No.391 of 2003).
S. 9(c)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)
Accused instead of contesting the charge had confessed his guilt during recording of evidence and again in his statement recorded under S.342, Cr.P.C., with the exception of leniency in the matter of sentence, but in view of the quantity of the. narcotics recovered from his possession he could not be awarded sentence less than imprisonment for life and the same was not interfered with
Fine of Rs.5,00,000 imposed upon accused was reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 or in default to pay the. same he was' directed to undergo 6 months' S.I.
Benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C. was also granted to accused
Petition for leave to appeal was converted into an appeal and disposed of accordingly. M. Saeed Khan, Additional Advocate-General for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, J:
The petitioner was tried for the charge under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997 by the Sessions Judge, Kohat and having been found guilty of the charge, ,was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,00,000 vide judgment dated 12-10-2001 and appeal filed by him against conviction and sentence awarded to him was dismissed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar vide impugned judgment.
2. The petitioner initially denied the charge but subsequently, during the recording of evidence by the trial Court,, he confessed his guilt and again in his statement under section 342, Cr.P.C. also admitted the commission of offence.
3. The learned counsel without contesting this petition on merits, has submitted that learned Judge in chamber in the High Court without considering the question of sentence, dismissed the appeal and so much so, the question regarding grant of benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was not attended and submitted that reasonable reduction in fine with benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C. would meet the ends of justice. The learned counsel for the State has not been able to justify the withholding of benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P,C. to the petitioner or convince us that in the circumstances of the present case, the fine of Rs.5,00,000 was not excessive. The petitioner instead of contesting the charge confessed his guilt with the expectation of leniency in the matter of sentence but we find that in view of the quantity of narcotics recovered from his possession, he could not be awarded sentence less than life imprisonment. However, the fine imposed upon the petitioner could be reduced to a reasonable extent and he would also be entitled to the benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.
4. In view of the above, we without interfering in the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment awarded to the' petitioner, deem it proper to reduce the fine of Rs.5,00,000 imposed upon .him to Rs.100,000/- and also grant him the benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. This petition is, therefore, converted into an appeal and stands disposed of with reduction of fine and. grant of benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. However, in default of payment of fine, the appellant will undergo S.I. for six months. This appeal with above modification in the judgment of High Court, is partly allowed. N.H.Q./G-21/SC Order accordingly.