Matter
Matter legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning
Connotation.
An employee of Government by statutory Rules and Regulations would not be governed by rule of Master and Servant:
Words "matter" and "issue"??Connotation of. Words "matter" and "issue"??Connotation of.
"Matter", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3116
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Matter"
1998 P L C 389
Messrs BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LTD Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal SindhP L D 2026 Supreme Court 291
Messrs MOON DENTAL CLINIC, ISLAMABAD and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD-WEST and another — Respondents
Court: ----Arts.175-F(1)(c) inserted through Constitution (Twenty-seventh Amendment) Act (XXXII of 2025) & 185(3)---Civil petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court---Maintainability Post---Twenty-seventh Constitutional amendment---Office objection---Matter relating to rent proceedings---No appeal lay before Supreme Court in rent matters, objection of---Legality---Rent matter not being expressly excluded from appellate jurisdiction of Federal Constitutional Court---Effect---Overruling of objection---Scope---Briefly, present petition for leave to appeal was filed against the High Court judgment passed under Article 199 of the Constitution in a rent matter, where the office objected that after Article 175F (27th Amendment), the High Court was the final forum and no appeal lay to the Supreme Court---Held: The proviso to Article 185(3), which provided that "no appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court in cases to which clause (1) of Article 175F applies", made it evident that the bar on the appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court was confined only to those cases which, in fact, fell within the ambit of Article 175F(1)---Since rent and family matters stood expressly excluded from the applicability of Article 175F(1)(c), such cases could not be regarded as cases to which Article 175F applied---Consequently, petitions arising out of rent and family matters were not barred from the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 185(3), subject to the grant of leave---The objection raised by the Office, premised on the petition arising out of a rent matter, was misconceived and was rightly overruled---In view of the express exclusion of rent matters from the scope of Article 175F(1)(c), such cases could not be regarded as falling within Article 175F(1)---The proviso to Article 185(3) was, therefore, not attracted, and the present petition was maintainable, in circumstances.2001 P T D 974
Smt. ARUNADEVI BAHETI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Court: 241 I T R 6221994 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD MOEZZEM TANVEER Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Court: Lahore High Court2001 C L C 702
MUHAMMAD AZAM and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus TARIQ TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD.
Court: Lahore2025 C L D 133
The GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others — Appellants Versus Messrs HMA PUMPS (PVT.) LTD. PESHAWAR CANTT. and another — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2025 Peshawar 41
The GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others — Appellants Versus Messrs HMA PUMPS (PVT.) LTD. PESHAWAR CANTT. and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2018 S C M R 1139
BRUCE CARSON — Appellant Versus HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Canada1983 S C M R 22
AJAIB KHAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: ----Art. 212-Jurisdiction of Supreme Court-Federal Shariat Court-- Not an Administrative Court or Tribunal-Appeals to Supreme Court under Art. 212 (3) of Constitution, held, can only be filed in respect of orders passed in connection with matters specified in Art. 212 and in no other matters.-Jurisdiction.1987 C L C 182
Malik MUHAMMAD HASAN‑‑Applicant Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, QUETTA
Court: Quetta