Home Maxims & Terms Judge meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Judge

Judge legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 CLC 34 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Knowledge of lawScope

Judge must wear all laws of country on his robes.

2010 SCMR 1778 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Law of land must be in sleeves of the Judge.

2008 PCrLJ 126 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judge, the final authority as to what takes place before him at a trialStatement of the Judge should be regarded as conclusive

Statement of the Judge must be considered as absolute verity and the same ought to be taken precisely as a record and must be acted upon in the same manner as on a record of Court, which by itself imports absolute verity

Law has made the Judge the final authority as to what takes place before him at a trial, and that authority must be recognized.

2007 SCMR 1786 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Superior judiciarySenior and junior JudgesScope

No concept of junior Judges in Superior Courts being treated as subordinate or subservient to senior Judges.

2005 MLD 1165 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judge must wear all the laws of the country on the sleeves of his robes

Any failure of counsel to properly advise the Judge is not a complete excuse in the matter.

2004 PLD 191 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Integrity and character of Judicial OfficersPrinciples

Although all civil servants are bound to be honest having unblemished integrity, the Judicial Officers are supposed to excel in this trait of character in view of the sacred and sensitive nature of their duties and the pivotal position which justice occupies in Islam

Islam also enjoins that those who perform the function of Judges must not only possess profound knowledge and deep insight but also be men of integrity and capable of holding the scales of justice even under all circumstances

Judicial Officers are expected to guard their reputation jealously and Reporting Officers/Countersigning Officers are obliged to assess their conduct after careful consideration and without being led away by any prejudice or bias.

2004 PLC(CS) 236 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Integrity and character of Judicial OfficersPrinciples

Although all civil servants are. bound to be honest having unblemished integrity, the Judicial Officers are supposed to excel in. this trait of character in view of the sacred, and sensitive nature of their duties and the pivotal position which justice occupies in Islam

Islam also enjoins that those who perform the function of Judges must not only possess profound knowledge and deep insight but also be men of integrity and capable of holding the scales of justice even under all circumstances

Judicial Officers are expected to guard their reputation jealously and Reporting Officers/.Countersigning Officers are obliged to assess their conduct after careful consideration and. without being led away by any prejudice or bias.

1999 YLR 981 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judge

Judge must wear all the laws of the country on the sleeves of his robe.

1994 SCMR 1682 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
JudgeRemoval from officeSuspension from judicial dutiesNatural justiceRule of audi alteram partemChief Justice deciding that Judge should not be rostered to sitChief Justice making complaint about Judge to Judicial and Legal Service Commission

Commission not giving Judge opportunity to answer charge before making representation to President that his removal be inquired into

Whether Chief Justice having power to bar Judge from sitting as part of administrative arrangements

Whether Chief Justice acted outside his administrative powers

Whether Commission required to give Judge opportunity to answer that charge before making representation to President that his removal be investigated

Constitution of the Republic Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago), S. 137.

1992 PLD 263 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Judge must wear all the laws of the country on the sleeves of his robe

Failure of counsel to properly advise Judge was not a complete excuse in the, matter.

1972 PLD 26 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Judge Sublime, duty of-Judge to administer law and not to make it

Maxim: Judicis est jus dicere, non dare (it is not the function of a Judge to make law but to administer it).

1967 PLD 882 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

(b) Legal Practice (Disqualifications) Ordinance (II of 1964), S. 3-Judge-Propriety and right of ex-Judges of Superior Courts to revert to legal practice-Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 166 (3)-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art 124-Retired Judges (Legal Practice) Order (21 of 1962), Art 3

1962 PLD 192 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Judge Judicial detachment Judge not to act as "adviser to Executive"-(Whether case was "weak", so far as "judicial" trial was concerned, and would be better withdrawn under S. 15, Frontier Crimes Regulation (III of 1901) for trial by Jirga.)

1961 PLD 237 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Judge

Expected to be careful to maintain dignity of Court-Loss of temper, improper language, or being excitable-Gives a shock to impersonal concept of seat of justice.

1961 PLD 13 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Judge -Duty to apply law as it is-Questioning wisdom of legislature except in "Pery extreme" case-Disapproved-Provision directing Sessions trial with assistance of assessors-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 309.

1961 PLD 78 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Judge Judge-Opinion expressed out of Court-Chief Justice's speech published in press-Not made subject of decision by any Court-Irrelevant in judicial proceedings.

1960 PLD 26 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Judge Judge-History of tenure of English Judges.

1958 PLD 333 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Judge Judge-Expressing strong views in strong language in regard to persons neither parties nor witnesses in case-Disapproved. Judge-Not to play role of moral or political reformer Judge laying down moral or political standards for choice of a Prime Minister travels beyond his functions.

1957 PLD 201 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Federal Court of Pakistan-Could hear appeals from orders passed by Revenue Courts under Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887) or the N.-W F. P. Tenancy Act (XXV of 1950)-Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 160-Federal Court Enlargement of Jurisdiction Act, 1949 (1 of 1950)-Privy Council (Abolition of Jurisdiction) Act, 1950-Criterion in regard to such appeals: Not whether the Courts whose orders were sought to be appealed from were special, but whether the rights dealt with were special, or only ordinary civil, rights.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Judge", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2919

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Judge"

PLD 1977
Writ Petition No. 793 of 1974, decided on 29th November 1976.

P L D 1977 Lahore 687

ABDUL SAMAD-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: S. 115(2) read with West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962), Ss. 6(2), 13 & 15-Conferring by District Judge of any of his functions on Additional District Judge as spelt out from Ordinance 11 of 1962-A special power, special jurisdiction and special procedure for disposal Inter alia of revision petitions and thus overrides bare text of Civil Procedure Code in S. 11.5(2)-Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 nor any other law has no specific provision to contrary.-Revision (civil).
MLD 2002
Civil Transfer Applications Nos.3, 4 and 5 of 2002, decided on 4th July, 2002.

2002 M L D 1790

MEHMOOD HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Applicants Versus L1AQUAT HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2014
Constitutional Petition No.9 of 2014, decided on 6th May, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1289

MUHAMMAD ASLAM AWAN, ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2026
2025-November-12

P L D 2026 Lahore 200

RIASAT ALI and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
GBLR 2015
N/A

2015 G B L R 293

N/A

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
PLC(CS) 2003
N/A

2003 P L C (C

SHER AFZAL KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Home Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Kashmir Affairs, Northern Areas State and Frontier Region, Islamabad and 5 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PCRLJ 1990
Criminal Bail Application No. 1093 of 1989, decided on 21st December, 19899

1990 P Cr

PERVAIZ alias PUTTAR‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2005
N/A

2005 P Cr

ZAFAR AWAN, ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus THE DISTRICT/SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAKWAL and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2010
Writ Petition No. 9838 and Criminal Original No. 925-W of 2010, decided on 5th July, 2010.

2010 Y L R 3098

GHULAM NABI — Petitioner Versus Mst. ASIA PERVEEN and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2019
2018-June-11

2019 P Cr

HAKIM ALI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)