Home Maxims & Terms Expunction of observations meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Expunction of observations

Expunction of observations legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PLC(CS) 1304 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2Interim injunctionDisobedience or breach of injunctionConsequencesExpunction of observationsScope

On the strength of credentials and being number one in the list of candidates, short listed for appointment of Vice Chancellor, appellant filed a suit as she viewed discrimination at the hands of the authority

Injunctive order was passed directing the Authority not to make final list in respect of the selected candidates

While the injunctive order was operating, a Vice Chancellor was appointed

Appellant being aggrieved of the notification yet again filed an application for seeking appropriate injunctive orders

Single Judge of High Court apart from issuing notices observed that suspension of notification would not be proper as it would adversely affect the functioning of the University and that the interim orders passed earlier were to continue till the next date of hearing

Validity

Once an earlier injunctive order was passed, a follow up order to carry the real object of the earlier order should have been passed

Single Judge of High Court was empowered to revisit and decide the applications finally but not in a cursory manner and that too after passing adverse remarks

Single Judge of High Court could have conveniently avoided the observation as only notices were ordered

Selection of observation by the Single Judge of High Court had perhaps overlapped and overshadowed the earlier order and the mandate without the applications being actually heard and decided

Impugned order was set aside to the extent of observations, in circumstances

Appeal was allowed.

2010 GBLR 353 SUPREME-APPELATE-COURT-GILGIT Judicial Precedent

Observations of Chief Court appearing to be out of the context were ordered to be expunged by the Supreme Appellate Court.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Expunction of observations", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939122

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Expunction of observations"

SCMR 1999
Civil Petitions Nos.956 and 957-L of 1997, decided on 6th July, 1998.

1999SCMR1317

MUMTAZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION SADDAR, RAHIMYAR KHAN

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1993
1992-July-8

1993 P Cr

MUHAMMAD JALAL — Appellant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 555‑M of 1984, heard on 3rd November, 1984.

1985 P Cr

Ch. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑‑Petitioner Versus The STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. 845 of 1988, decided on 8th July, 1991.

1992 P L C (C

ABDUL RASHID Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Agriculture, Punjab

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No. 2 of 1987, decided on 19th September, 1988.

1989 P L C (C

ALI ANWAR GHANGHRO Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND through its Chief Secretary and another

Court: Service Tribunal Sind
SCMR 1968
Criminal Appeal No. 33 of 1968, decided on 19th June 1968:

1968 S C M R 1359

SHUJA‑UD‑DIN‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC 1993
‑‑‑‑ Adverse remarks, expunction of‑‑‑Selection grade, grant of‑‑‑Employee was ignored for selection grade on ground that he had earned adverse remarks in his A.C.Rs.‑‑‑Evidence brought on record had fully established that during relevant years, explanation of employee was never called for and his work and conduct was never commented upon‑‑‑Representation of employee against adverse remarks was not decided one way or the other till he was ignored for grant of selection grade from due date‑‑‑No one could be penalised on basis of adverse remarks till decision of his representation for their expunction‑‑ Contention of employee that adverse remarks were without any basis having fully been substantiated, order ignoring employee for grant of Selection Grade on basis of such unjustified remarks, could not sustain.

1993 P L C 740

SHER MUHAMMAD Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
CLC 1981
High Court Appeal No. 69 of 1974, decided on 1st March, 1981.

1981 C L C 1374

Syed ISHTIAQ ALI, ADVOCATE‑‑Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF SIND ANC 12 OTHERS ‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No.93 of 1987, decided on 9th February, 1989.

1989 P L C 721

NISAR AHMAD CHARAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others

Court: Service Tribunal Sind
PCRLJ 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1958, decided on 17th October 1958.

1969 P Cr

ABDUL HAYEE KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court