1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ABDUL RASHID Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Agriculture, Punjab
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | ABDUL RASHID Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Agriculture, Punjab |
| Primary Law | (b) Civil service, (a) Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil service, (a) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL RASHID Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Agriculture, Punjab). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Taqi for Appellant.
- Syed Abbas Rana, D.A. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 29th May, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
In absence of any rule or regulation conferring authority on Minister to order expunction of adverse remarks against civil servant he was not competent or designated Authority for expunction of adverse remarks against civil servant. -- --Adverse remarks
Adverse remarks earlier passed against civil servant, admittedly were expugned by Authorities concerned with direct order of Minister
Thus remarks that civil servant "used political pressure for expunction of adverse remarks" had fully been established as such did not deserve to be expugned
Authorities had produced sufficient evidence to' prove remarks relating to non-submission of required cost analysis reports by civil servant despite repeated directions of competent Authority which amounted to disobeying instructions of superiors
Adverse remarks against civil servant based on personal observation of Authority as well as on facts, could not be expunged. Abdul Rauf v. Director, Local Government and Rural Development, Sargodha Division and another 1989 P L C (C.S.) 436 ref.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Civil service
In absence of any rule or regulation conferring authority on Minister to order expunction of adverse remarks against civil servant he was not competent or designated Authority for expunction of adverse remarks against civil servant. (b) Civil service
Adverse remarks earlier passed against civil servant, admittedly were expugned by Authorities concerned with direct order of Minister
Thus remarks that civil servant "used political pressure for expunction of adverse remarks" had fully been established as such did not deserve to be expugned
Authorities had produced sufficient evidence to' prove remarks relating to non-submission of required cost analysis reports by civil servant despite repeated directions of competent Authority which amounted to disobeying instructions of superiors
Adverse remarks against civil servant based on personal observation of Authority as well as on facts, could not be expunged. Abdul Rauf v. Director, Local Government and Rural Development, Sargodha Division and another 1989 P L C (C.S.) 436 ref. Muhammad Taqi for Appellant. Syed Abbas Rana, D.A. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 29th May, 1991.