PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

EID MUHAMMAD and another Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Sindh
Decided Date
Appeals Nos. 79 and 80 of 1990, decided on 31st October 1991.
Honorable Judges
Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Allauddin Sabir, Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Sindh
Bench Members Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Allauddin Sabir, Member
Parties EID MUHAMMAD and another Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others
Primary Law Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Allauddin Sabir, Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (EID MUHAMMAD and another Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1973)

Representation

  • Nizamuddin Baloch for Appellants.
  • Date of hearing: 16th October 1991.

Headnotes / Summary

S.4

Appeal against penalty of dismissal from service

Two separate appeals, one filed by "E" and the other filed by "M" having been consolidated were disposed of through one judgment

Civil servant "E" was directly linked with the removal of articles in question, from the: office where he was serving, while appellant "M" was not directly linked with the removal of those articles-- Enquiry Officer's report on basis of which both the civil servants were dismissed, while linked civil servant "E" with the removal of articles in question, on the basis of evidence, based its finding with regard to civil servant "M" on conjectures

Civil servant "E's" appeal was dismissed but his order of dismissal from service was converted into removal from service

Civil servant "M's" appeal was accepted giving him benefit of doubt. Zawar Hussain Shah, AA.-G. for the Government.

Judgment & Decree

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others Appeals Nos. 79 and 80 of 1990, decided on 31st October 1991.

S.4

Appeal against penalty of dismissal from service

Two separate appeals, one filed by "E" and the other filed by "M" having been consolidated were disposed of through one judgment

Civil servant "E" was directly linked with the removal of articles in question, from the: office where he was serving, while appellant "M" was not directly linked with the removal of those articles-- Enquiry Officer's report on basis of which both the civil servants were dismissed, while linked civil servant "E" with the removal of articles in question, on the basis of evidence, based its finding with regard to civil servant "M" on conjectures

Civil servant "E's" appeal was dismissed but his order of dismissal from service was converted into removal from service

Civil servant "M's" appeal was accepted giving him benefit of doubt. Nizamuddin Baloch for Appellants. Zawar Hussain Shah, AA.-G. for the Government. Date of hearing: 16th October 1991.