PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

AHSANULLAH A. MEMON Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 3 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Sindh
Decided Date
Appeal No. 97 of 1989, decided on 29th July, 1991.
Honorable Judges
Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Ghulam Mujadid Isran, Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Sindh
Bench Members Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Ghulam Mujadid Isran, Member
Parties AHSANULLAH A. MEMON Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 3 others
Primary Law (b) Sindh Civil Servants Act mV of 1973), (d) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), (c) Words and phrases
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Sindh Civil Servants Act mV of 1973), (d) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), (c) Words and phrases, (a) Civil service, (e) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Ghulam Mujadid Isran, Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (AHSANULLAH A. MEMON Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 3 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Sindh Civil Servants Act mV of 1973) (d) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973) (c) Words and phrases (a) Civil service (e) Civil service

Representation

  • Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant.
  • M. Aqil Awan for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.
  • M.L. Shahani for Respondent No. 4.
  • Date of hearing: 17th July 1991.

Headnotes / Summary

Appeal

Maintainability

Civil servant had challenged in appeal Department's notification according to which respondent civil servant was permanently absorbed in Department retrospectively

Civil servant had apprehended that said notification had effect of making respondent senior to him

Notification admittedly did not even remotely make a mention of civil servant's name, thus it had absolutely no linkage with civil servant nor it had caused violation of his terms and conditions of service

Fear of civil servant that said notification posed positive threat to his service, might be quite genuine, but unless it had actually disturbed his seniority by way of adverse entries in seniority list or by such other step taken in the light of that notification, cause of action could not be held to have accrued to him-- Howsoever imminent may be fear of future, it could not provide basis for launching litigation

Notification challenged by civil servant in appeal admittedly having not provided him any cause of action, appeal was not maintainable.

S.8

Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, Transfer) Rules, 1974, R.7

Sindh Civil Servants (Promotion, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975, Rr. 10 & 12

Seniority

Respondent civil servant who was working in University, was posted in same capacity on deputation for a period of two years in Education Department where subsequently he was permanently absorbeds from date he joined it on deputation

Permanent absorption of civil servant admittedly was never referred to relevant Departmental Promotion Committee nor said Committee had given its approval for his appointment

Seniority to be determined from date of regular appointment of civil servant according to be rules

Seniority of civil servant who was transferred on deputation to Education Department, could not be reckoned from date of his permanent absorption which was made without recommendation of Departmental Promotion Committee.

Compensate

Meaning

Compensate means to make amends for, or to recompense; to counter-balance; to make up.

S.24

Government, which had been vested with plenary powers under section 24 of Act, 1973 was free to pass any order which was just and equitable and such powers, could not be clipped so as to be restricted to allowing only money compensation to civil servant

Government empowered to make rules, I could pass order even outside rules and order so passed would be deemed to have modified rules in respect of case in which it was passed-- Notwithstanding, absence of any rule or other legal provisions on the subject Government or Rule-making Authority should not be helpless or handicapped to in dealing with any case in just and equitable manner. Pakistan v. Abdul Hamid PLD 1961 SC 105; Aijaz Hussain Kazi's case 1988 PLC (C.S.)' 916; PLD 1971 SC 846; Province of the Punjab v. Ch. Nazir a Hussain PLD 1956 Lah.556; PLD 1960 SC 130; Province of West Pakistan vs. Din Muhammad PLD 1964 SC 21 and Muhammad Naseem Ahmad v. Azrac Feroz Bakht PLD 1968 SC 37 ref.

Seniority

Powers of Government to determine seniority

Government, a although had been vested with plenary powers to determine seniority of civil a servant through selection, but that could be done by Government only after appointment of civil servant was regularised in accordance with prescribed procedure

For compliance of that requirement, all that was needed was to obtain approval of Departmental Promotion Committee or Selection Committee regarding fitness of civil servant for the post concerned

Powers vested in Government would not concede power to it to substitute itself in place of Selection Committee/Board for determining fitness of civil servant for job in question

If such power was allowed, it could be misused and thereby s create unnecessary misunderstanding against Government

If power of making selection on merits was vested in Government, it was likely that it would be repeatedly used rendering selection authorities such as Public Service Commission and Departmental Promotion Committee/Board, absolutely redundant.

Judgment & Decree

(c) Words and phrases

Compensate

Meaning

Compensate means to make amends for, or to recompense; to counter-balance; to make up. (d) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)

S.24

Government, which had been vested with plenary powers under section 24 of Act, 1973 was free to pass any order which was just and equitable and such powers, could not be clipped so as to be restricted to allowing only money compensation to civil servant

Government empowered to make rules, I could pass order even outside rules and order so passed would be deemed to have modified rules in respect of case in which it was passed-- Notwithstanding, absence of any rule or other legal provisions on the subject Government or Rule-making Authority should not be helpless or handicapped to in dealing with any case in just and equitable manner. Pakistan v. Abdul Hamid PLD 1961 SC 105; Aijaz Hussain Kazi's case 1988 PLC (C.S.)' 916; PLD 1971 SC 846; Province of the Punjab v. Ch. Nazir a Hussain PLD 1956 Lah.556; PLD 1960 SC 130; Province of West Pakistan vs. Din Muhammad PLD 1964 SC 21 and Muhammad Naseem Ahmad v. Azrac Feroz Bakht PLD 1968 SC 37 ref. (e) Civil service

Seniority

Powers of Government to determine seniority

Government, a although had been vested with plenary powers to determine seniority of civil a servant through selection, but that could be done by Government only after appointment of civil servant was regularised in accordance with prescribed procedure

For compliance of that requirement, all that was needed was to obtain approval of Departmental Promotion Committee or Selection Committee regarding fitness of civil servant for the post concerned

Powers vested in Government would not concede power to it to substitute itself in place of Selection Committee/Board for determining fitness of civil servant for job in question

If such power was allowed, it could be misused and thereby s create unnecessary misunderstanding against Government

If power of making selection on merits was vested in Government, it was likely that it would be repeatedly used rendering selection authorities such as Public Service Commission and Departmental Promotion Committee/Board, absolutely redundant. Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant. M. Aqil Awan for Respondents Nos. 1 to

3. M.L. Shahani for Respondent No.

4. Date of hearing: 17th July 1991.