PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

RABDINO "RABNAWAZ" HINGORO Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, New Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Sindh
Decided Date
Appeal No. 29 of 1991, decided on 10th December, 1991.
Honorable Judges
Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Rashid Khan Sherwani, Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Sindh
Bench Members Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Rashid Khan Sherwani, Member
Parties RABDINO "RABNAWAZ" HINGORO Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, New Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others
Primary Law (b) Civil service, (a) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil service, (a) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Rashid Khan Sherwani, Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (RABDINO "RABNAWAZ" HINGORO Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, New Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Civil service (a) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)

Representation

  • Manzoor Ali Khan (present) for Appellant.
  • Date of hearing: 10th December, 1991.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 10

Transfer

Civil servant was liable to be transferred anywhere including the post under Federal Government or any other Provincial Government or even a local authority, body or corporation, unless he was recruited to serve in particular area or region

Only protection provided to transferee was that in case he was required to serve outside his service or cadre, his terms and conditions of service as to his pay would not be less favourable than those to which he would have been entitled, if he had not been so transferred.

Transfer from one office to another of same, department

Effect

Civil servant holding post of Cess/Taxation Officer on regular basis was transferred and posted as Assistant Commissioner, Mines in the same Department though to a different office

Such transfer was not fresh appointment by transfer-- Civil servant could be repatriated to his original post

Order of repatriation was, thus, legal and no exception could be taken thereto. Official Respondent in person. Private Respondent in person.

Judgment & Decree

(a) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)

S. 10

Transfer

Civil servant was liable to be transferred anywhere including the post under Federal Government or any other Provincial Government or even a local authority, body or corporation, unless he was recruited to serve in particular area or region

Only protection provided to transferee was that in case he was required to serve outside his service or cadre, his terms and conditions of service as to his pay would not be less favourable than those to which he would have been entitled, if he had not been so transferred. (b) Civil service

Transfer from one office to another of same, department

Effect

Civil servant holding post of Cess/Taxation Officer on regular basis was transferred and posted as Assistant Commissioner, Mines in the same Department though to a different office

Such transfer was not fresh appointment by transfer-- Civil servant could be repatriated to his original post

Order of repatriation was, thus, legal and no exception could be taken thereto. Manzoor Ali Khan (present) for Appellant. Official Respondent in person. Private Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 10th December, 1991.