Parliamentary Republic
Parliamentary Republic legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
President was the Head of the State and represented the unity of the Republic, therefore, after being sworn in as the President, he owed a constitutional duty to represent the unity of the Republic as Head of the State and under the Constitution he was not supposed to support any favoured candidate in the elections or a group of political parties
Need for a symbolic figurehead who was representative of the State in its majesty was central to the structure of the parliamentary system
President in Parliamentary Republics was expected to be apolitical/non-partisan and objectively disengaged with any and all affiliations of political, ethnic, linguistic, or geographic nature
President being the symbol of the unity of the Federation occupied a neutral position under the Constitution and was not envisaged by the Constitution to be supporting or backing any particular political party or a group of political parties, or certain individual politicians or candidates contesting election from a given platform to the disadvantage of any other political party, politician, political worker, individual, etc.
President represented the majesty of the State, though only symbolically, and had rapport with all manner of people and parties, being above politics
President, as the constitutional Head of the State, was obliged to perform his functions and duties neutrally and impartially and was not supposed to indulge into politics.
"Parliamentary Republic", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939206
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Parliamentary Republic"
P L D 2013 Supreme Court 1
Air Marshal (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASGHAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus General (Retd). MIRZA ASLAM BAIG, FORMER CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2017 C L C 1066
LAWYERS FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 C L C 25
HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, HYDERABAD through President and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and Justice and Human Rights Division and others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1996 Lahore 658
M. D. TAHIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:2010 SCMR 563
NADEEM AHMED, Advocate and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1992 S C M R 1166
MUHAMMAD BAKHSH and 4 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 S C M R 1043
IMRAN KHAN NIAZI — Appellant Versus AYESHA GULALAI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2021 Lahore 544
VICE-CHAIRMAN PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1997 SCMR 232
ABDUL MUJEEB PIRZADA and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2021 Lahore 605
GHULAM YASIN BHATTI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: High Court