Home Maxims & Terms Parliamentary Republic meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Parliamentary Republic

Parliamentary Republic legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 41(1), 42, 48 & 243Parliamentary RepublicPresident, office ofApolitical roleScopeConstitutional system of government in Pakistan was that of a Parliamentary Republic

President was the Head of the State and represented the unity of the Republic, therefore, after being sworn in as the President, he owed a constitutional duty to represent the unity of the Republic as Head of the State and under the Constitution he was not supposed to support any favoured candidate in the elections or a group of political parties

Need for a symbolic figurehead who was representative of the State in its majesty was central to the structure of the parliamentary system

President in Parliamentary Republics was expected to be apolitical/non-partisan and objectively disengaged with any and all affiliations of political, ethnic, linguistic, or geographic nature

President being the symbol of the unity of the Federation occupied a neutral position under the Constitution and was not envisaged by the Constitution to be supporting or backing any particular political party or a group of political parties, or certain individual politicians or candidates contesting election from a given platform to the disadvantage of any other political party, politician, political worker, individual, etc.

President represented the majesty of the State, though only symbolically, and had rapport with all manner of people and parties, being above politics

President, as the constitutional Head of the State, was obliged to perform his functions and duties neutrally and impartially and was not supposed to indulge into politics.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Parliamentary Republic", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939206

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Parliamentary Republic"

PLD 2013
2012-October-19

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 1

Air Marshal (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASGHAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus General (Retd). MIRZA ASLAM BAIG, FORMER CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2017
N/A

2017 C L C 1066

LAWYERS FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2016
2015-August-3

2016 C L C 25

HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, HYDERABAD through President and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and Justice and Human Rights Division and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1996
Writ Petition No.2800 of 1996, decided on 12th August, 1996.

P L D 1996 Lahore 658

M. D. TAHIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court:
SCMR 2010
Constitutional Petitions Nos.2, 3 and 4 of 2010, decided on 13th February 2010.

2010 SCMR 563

NADEEM AHMED, Advocate and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1992
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.913/L of 1990, decided on 3rd April, 1991.

1992 S C M R 1166

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH and 4 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2018
Civil Appeal No. 1559 of 2017, decided on 14th March, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1043

IMRAN KHAN NIAZI — Appellant Versus AYESHA GULALAI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2021
N/A

P L D 2021 Lahore 544

VICE-CHAIRMAN PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1997
Civil Appeals Nos. 397‑K, 399‑K of 1990, Constitutional Petitions Nos.60, 67 and 68 of 1996, decided on 12th January, 1997.

1997 SCMR 232

ABDUL MUJEEB PIRZADA and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2021
2021-April-7

P L D 2021 Lahore 605

GHULAM YASIN BHATTI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents

Court: High Court