SCMR 1997

1997 SCMR 232 (PLP)

ABDUL MUJEEB PIRZADA and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Appeals Nos. 397‑K, 399‑K of 1990, Constitutional Petitions Nos.60, 67 and 68 of 1996, decided on 12th January, 1997.
Honorable Judges
Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J., Saleem Akhtar, Fazal Ilahi Khan,
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1997 SCMR 232 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J., Saleem Akhtar, Fazal Ilahi Khan,
Parties ABDUL MUJEEB PIRZADA and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997 SCMR 232 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997 SCMR 232 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J., Saleem Akhtar, Fazal Ilahi Khan,.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1997 SCMR 232 (PLP) (ABDUL MUJEEB PIRZADA and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Nemo for Appellant (in C. A. No.399‑K of 1990).
  • Qazi M. Jamil, Advocate Supreme Court and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No. 60 of 1996).
  • Dr. A. Basit, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No. 68 of 1996):
  • Khalid Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Mian Saqib Nisar, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Zaidi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l (in all Cases).
  • Ali Ahmed Fazeel, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Ghauri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.24 (in C.A. 397‑K of 1990) and for Respondent No.3 (in C.A. No'. 399‑K of 1990).
  • Dates of hearing: 14th, 18th, 21st to 23rd December, 1996 and 7th, 8th, 11th and 12th January, 1997.
  • Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) (in C.A. No. 397‑K of 1996).
  • M. Ismail Qureshi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Applicants (in C.M.A. No. 913 of 1996 in C.A. No.397‑K of 1990).
  • Sharifuddin Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Anwar Mansoor Khan, Advocate and Ch. Fazl‑e‑Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Preamble‑‑‑Prominent characteristics of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as reflected in the Objectives Resolution is Federalism and Parliamentary Form of Government blended with Islamic provisions. What is the basic structure of the Constitution is a question of academic nature which cannot be answered authoritatively with a touch of finality but it can be said that the prominent characteristics of the Constitution are amply reflected in the Objectives Resolution which is now substantive part of the Constitution as Article 2A inserted by the Eighth Amendment. The Objectives Resolution was Preamble of the Constitutions made and promulgated in the Constitutions of 1956, 1962 and 1973. Perusal of the Objectives Resolution shows that for scheme of governance the main features envisaged are Federalism and Parliamentary Form of Government blended with Islamic provisions. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Preamble‑‑‑Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act (XVIII of 1985), Preamble‑‑‑Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act, 1985 has been ratified by implication so as to stay in the Constitution unless amended in the manner prescribed in Art. 239 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was inserted in the Constitution in 1985, after which three elections were held on party‑basis and the resultant Parliaments did not touch this Amendment, which demonstrates amply that this Amendment is ratified by implication and has come to stay in the Constitution unless amended in the manner prescribed in the Constitution as contemplated under Article 239. (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art.58(2)(b) [as brought in the Constitution by Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act (XVIII of 1985)]‑‑‑Object of Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution‑‑‑Provision of Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution which maintains Parliamentary Form of Government has provided checks and balances between the powers of the President and the Prime Minister to let the system work without let or hindrance to forestall a situation in which martial law could be imposed. Article 58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) brought in the Constitution by the Eighth Amendment, which maintains Parliamentary Form of Government has provided checks and balances between the powers of the President and the Prime Minister to let the system work without let or hindrance to forestall a situation in which martial law could be imposed. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) (in C.A. No. 397‑K of 1996). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 67 of 1996). Remaining Respondent Ex: parte. M. Ismail Qureshi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Applicants (in C.M.A. No. 913 of 1996 in C.A. No.397‑K of 1990). Shehzad Jehangir, Attorney‑General for Pakistan on Court Notice. Sharifuddin Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Anwar Mansoor Khan, Advocate and Ch. Fazl‑e‑Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae.

Judgment & Decree

Article 58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) brought in the Constitution by the Eighth Amendment, which maintains Parliamentary Form of Government has provided checks and balances between the powers of the President and the Prime Minister to let the system work without let or hindrance to forestall a situation in which martial law could be imposed. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) (in C.A. No. 397‑K of 1996). Nemo for Appellant (in C. A. No.399‑K of 1990). Qazi M. Jamil, Advocate Supreme Court and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No. 60 of 1996). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 67 of 1996). Dr. A. Basit, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No. 68 of 1996): Khalid Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Mian Saqib Nisar, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Zaidi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l (in all Cases). Ali Ahmed Fazeel, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Ghauri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.24 (in C.A. 397‑K of 1990) and for Respondent No.3 (in C.A. No'. 399‑K of 1990). Remaining Respondent Ex: parte. M. Ismail Qureshi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Applicants (in C.M.A. No. 913 of 1996 in C.A. No.397‑K of 1990). Shehzad Jehangir, Attorney‑General for Pakistan on Court Notice. Sharifuddin Pirzada, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Anwar Mansoor Khan, Advocate and Ch. Fazl‑e‑Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae. Dates of hearing: 14th, 18th, 21st to 23rd December, 1996 and 7th, 8th, 11th and 12th January, 1997. For reasons to be recorded later, we pass following short order.

2. What is the basic structure of the Constitution is a question of academic nature which cannot be answered authoritatively with a touch of finality but it can be said that the prominent characteristics of the Constitution are amply reflected in the Objectives Resolution which is now substantive part of the Constitution as Article 2A inserted by the Eighth Amendment.

3. The Objectives Resolution was Preamble of the Constitutions made and promulgated in our country in 1956, 1962 and 1973. Perusal of the Objectives Resolution shows that for scheme of governance the main features envisaged are Federalism and Parliamentary Form of Government blended with Islamic provisions. The Eighth Amendment was inserted in the Constitution in 1985, after which three elections were held on party‑basis and the resultant Parliaments did not touch this Amendment, which demonstrates amply that this Amendment is ratified by implication and has come to stay in the Constitution unless amended in the manner prescribed in the Constitution as contemplated under Article

239. Article 58(2)(b) brought in the Constitution by the Eighth Amendment, which maintains Parliamentary Form of Government has provided checks and balances between the powers of the President and the Prime Minister to let the system work without let or hindrance to forestall a situation in which martial law could be imposed.

4. In the result the two Civil Appeals Nos.397‑K/90 (Abdul Mujib Pirzada v. Federation of Islamic. Republic of Pakistan), 399‑K/90 (Haji Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others), and three Constitutional Petitions Nos. 60/90 a (Mahmood Khan Achakzai v. President of Pakistan and others), 67/96 (Habibul Wahabul Khairy v. Federation of Pakistan and others) and 68/96 (Wukala Mahaz Barai Tahafuz Dastoor v. Federation of Pakistan and others) are dismissed. PER ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, J.‑‑I only agree with the conclusion that the appeals and Constitutional petitions mentioned in para.4 merit dismissal for which I shall separately record my reasons detailed. . M.B.A./A‑1445‑S Petition dismissed.