Home Maxims & Terms Stay meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Stay

Stay legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1987 SCMR 1905 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XLI, R.5StayVacation of

Condition precedent not fulfilled-Supreme Court granting stay of execution of impugned judgment subject to petitioner's paying monthly compensation for use and occupation of disputed property during pendency of proceedings

Petitioners failing to fulfil condition precedent

Interim stay vacated.

1987 SCMR 1169 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 1StayGrant ofStatutory appeal as of rightPrima facie caseElection disputeAppeal to Supreme CourtSuspension of Order of Election TribunalAge of returned candidate for National Assembly disputed in Election Petition

Tribunal itself feeling difficulty in finding satisfactory evidence on record as to questions (i) whether alleged disqualification was known to voters and (ii) whether finding on issue of age of appellant would be gone into in light of evidence on record in statutory appeal by right

There being prima facie case for interference so far as interim stay was concerned, operation of impugned order suspended.

1983 SCMR 906 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Mere filing of appeal or revision does not ' operate as stay order-Prohibition or restraint cannot be implied but must be clearly expressed and communicated.

1979 SCMR 524 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 13 (6) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3}-Leave to appeal-Stay-Petitioner's counsel having relied on decision of a High Court holding order for deposit of tentative rent to be not final and tenant as such being entitled to show cause against same before his defence eventually ordered to be struck off-Execution of ejectment order stayed till hearing of main petition on condition of petitioner depositing future monthly rent before 15th of each succeeding calendar month.

1970 SCMR 285 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Execution proceedings-Stay-Money suit- Courts usually do not stay execution of decree in, till disposal of appeal because no irreparable loss caused thereby.

1962 PLD 11 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Stay Stay-Criminal proceeding-Civil suit pending between parties on substantially identical issues-Stay of criminal case when desirable. Though no invariable rule can be laid down, it is ordinarily undesirable to institute criminal proceedings until the determination of civil proceedings in which the same issues are involved. A case in which the criminal liability of the accused could be established regardless of the result of the civil suit, stay of the criminal proceedings would be declined. But, where, the decision in the civil suit is likely to have a direct and vital bearing upon the alleged guilt or otherwise of the accused in the criminal case or render his prosecution, for all practical purposes, infructuous, the proper course is to keep the criminal case stayed. Similarly if the object of the criminal proceedings, in a private prosecution, is to use it as a lever to coerce the accused Into a compromise of civil suit or if there Is the chance of prejudice to the accused if the criminal case against him were allowed to proceed and be disposed of before the civil suit and should the case be thus decided unfavourably to him, that decision is likely to prejudice him in his defence in the civil suit as well, the Court will be fully justified in staying a criminal case before it till the disposal of a civil suit pending between the parties.

1956 PLD 40 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Stay Stay-Of criminal proceedings-Pending civil suit-No hard and fast rule-Every case to be-decided on its own peculiar circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Stay", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14567

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stay"

PTD 1999
C. W. P. No. 1631 and C. M. No. 2909 of 1997, decided on 22nd April, 1997

1999 P T D 1465

ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL Versus INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others

Court: 226 I T R 490
PTD 2017
M.A. (Rect.) Nos.10/KB, 11/KB and 12/KB of 2013 In F.E. Stay Nos.06/KB, 07/KB and 08/KB of 2013, decided on 3rd December, 2013.

2017 P T D (Trib

Messrs BANK ISLAMI PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI Versus The C.I.R., AUDIT UNIT-4 ZONE-II, LTU, KARACHI

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
YLR 2022
N/A

2022 Y L R 773

AHMAD LATIF, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER and 2 others — Petitioners Versus The CANE COMMISSIONER and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1996
Civil Appeal No.210 of 1993, decided on 14th June, 1995.

1996 S C M R 1883

KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., LAHORE‑‑‑Appellant Versus KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1997
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1103 of 1994, decided on 5th January, 1995.

1996 P T D 1196

SHIV SHAKTI RUBBER AND CHEMICALS WORKS Versus INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others

Court: 213 I T R 299
PTD 2017
M.A. (Stay) No.19/KB and S.T.A. No.28/KB of 2014, decided on 14th April, 2014.

2017 P T D (Trib

Messrs SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI Versus C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2017
M.A. (Stay) No. 127/LB and S.T.A. No. 78/LB of 2015, decided on 31st January, 2015.

2017 P T D (Trib

Messrs K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD Versus CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2026
M.A. (Stay) No.2063/LB/2025 in S.T.A. No.8941/LB of 2024, decided on 22nd May, 2025.

2026 P T D (Trib

Messrs A. RAHIM FOODS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
YLR 2012
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.119 of 2009, decided on 22nd March, 2011.

2012YLR 1973

ABDUL GHAFOOR and 4 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K
PTD 2000
Writ Petition No.215 of 1998, decided on 6th February, 1998.

2000 P T D 142

DEBASISH MOULIK Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 231 I T R 737