Home Maxims & Terms Significance and corroboration meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Significance and corroboration

Significance and corroboration legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 192 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 302Qatl-e-amdBallistic expert reportSignificance and corroboration

Where, in a murder case, it is alleged that the fatality occurred because of firing and/or fire shot and the weapon and the bullet or empties were recovered, it becomes essential, that ballistic expert report is obtained inasmuch as there can be no better evidence than the ballistic expert report which would conclusively and scientifically show if the bullet and/or empties were in fact fired from the said weapon

Ballistic expert report could further be corroborated through evidence of other witnesses to reach a just conclusion of the case to ensure that no one suffered for lack of evidence.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Significance and corroboration", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939294

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Significance and corroboration"

PCRLJ 2013
2011-November-25

2013 P Cr

ABDUL WAHID — Appellant Versus UMAR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 1957, decided on 10th October 1957.

1969 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ASLAM AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court
SCMR 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 1957, decided on 10th October 1957.

1969 S C M R 383

MUHAMMAD ASLAM AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2004
Criminal Appeal No. 611 and Criminal Revision No. 17 of 2003, decided on 29th December, 2003.

2004 P Cr

RAHIM SHAH‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1987 in Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1987, decided on 1st June, 1987.

1987 M L D 1659

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2018
2017-April-17

2018 M L D 761

MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
SCMR 2025
Jail Petition No. 438 of 2018, decided on 25th February, 2025.

2025 S C M R 744

IMTIAZ NAEEM — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1999
Criminal Appeal No.264 of 1996, heard on 10th September, 1998.

1999 P Cr

AURANGZEB‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1999
1996-August-18

1999 M L D 2445

MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2025
2025-January-2

2025 Y L R 2143

Amjad alias Abi and another — Appellants Versus The State through Advocate General and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)