Protection to property
Protection to property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Federal Land Commission in exercise of suo motu powers of revision under Para-29 of Land Reforms Regulations, 1972 (M.L.R. 115), declared alienation of land in question by petitioner in favour of her children to be void
Validity
Produce Index Units (PIU) of petitioner were below the ceiling of 12000 PIUs, which fact had been highlighted from the record and the same left no scope for Land Commission to exercise any power of resumption in respect of land in question
At the time of passing of order by Federal Land Commission, the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) had been enforced whereby in Art. 24, it was ensured that no person would be deprived of his property save in accordance with law, which provided for compensation thereof
Order passed by Federal Land Commission was violative of such concept of the Constitution
Genuine transaction of sale by petitioner in favour of her minor children was effected and incorporated in revenue record, bona fides of which transaction was accepted by authorities
Order passed by Federal Land Commission which was not based upon legally admissible evidence duly collected by authorities was therefore, illegality passed and was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect
Petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Protection to property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939501
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Protection to property"
2001 C L C 533
IKRAM‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning
Court: Lahore2013 M L D 1
Mst. GHULAM SAHIRA and others — Petitioners Versus MEMBER FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2006 Supreme Court 1
Suo Motu Petition No. 11 of 2005
Court: High CourtP L D 2001 Karachi 203
ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. — Petitioner Versus THE WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN) and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2001 M L D 1013
Sardar SULTAN AHMAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Project Director, Department of Agriculture Punjab, Lahore and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2018 Y L R 3
OSMAN YASIN — Plaintiff Versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator and 7 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh1995 C L C 1662
Malik GUL HASSAN & Co: ‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary, Ministry of Health,
Court: Quetta1995 C L C 1039
M.D. TAHIR‑‑‑Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2023 Supreme Court 277
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defence Rawalpindi and others — Appellants Versus Mst. ZAKIA BEGUM and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1993 Lahore 732
NARGIS SHAHEEN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 5 others‑Respondents
Court: S. 9 ‑‑‑ Evidence ‑‑‑ Probability can have the . force of evidence.‑‑ Evidence.