CLC 2001

2001 PLP 533 (CLC)

IKRAM‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petitions Nos.938, 939 and 884 of 1999, decided on 4th July, 2000.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2001 PLP 533 (CLC)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, J
Parties IKRAM‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 533 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 533 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 533 (CLC) (IKRAM‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Tauhid‑ud‑Rehman for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Cantonments Act (XI of 1924)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 181 & Chap. XI [Ss. 178‑A to 197]‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Restraining construction by Cantonment Board‑‑‑Security risk in sensitive areas‑‑‑Jurisdiction of Cantonment Board‑‑ Dispute was with regard to location of the plots purchased by the petitioners in open auction from Provincial Government‑‑‑Plots were adjacent to the residential houses of the most senior military officials‑‑‑Land in question was situated in cantonment area but the same was not owned by the Cantonment Board‑‑‑Cantonment Board restrained the petitioners from raising construction on the plots for the reason that the plots were a security risk to the senior military officials‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑No building in the cantonment area could be created without the permission of Cantonment Board as provided under Chap. XI of Cantonments Act, 1924‑‑‑Cantonment Board without being owner of land, in exercise of powers, under the provisions of S.181(2) of Cantonments Act, 1924, could, in sensitive cases, prohibit erection of building‑‑‑Provincial Government realized that the disputed housing scheme was a security risk and agreed for exchange of land with the land of Federal Government under the Control of Ministry of Defence‑‑ Petitioners agreed to surrender their rights in the disputed plots subject to return of their principal amount with 12‑1/2% mark‑up‑‑‑Authorities were directed by the High Court for the return of the principal amount with mark up. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Arts. 23 & 24‑‑‑Protection to properties‑‑‑Every citizen has a right to acquire, hold and dispose of property in any part of Pakistan‑‑‑Government in public interest, on payment of compensation as provided under Art.24 of the Constitution, can take private property of a person. Sardar Muhammad Ghazi, Legal Advisor, Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi. Lt.‑Col. Iqbal Hashmi, Asstt. Judge, A.‑G. for Ministry of Defence. Raja Iftikhar Ahmad Javaid, Standing Counsel. Raja Saeed Akram, Asstt. A.‑G.

Judgment & Decree

(Sd.) Major‑General Shujaat Ali Khan." Letter dated 15-17-1999 "I wish to seek your personal indulgence in an important matter concerning the Khayaban‑e‑M.A. Jinnah Area Development Scheme, Old Central Jail, Rawalpindi. (2) A sketch of the area is enclosed and may please be glanced through. As could be seen, part of Old _ Central Jail Area (Block‑A) has been converted into Jinnah Park and Block‑B is being used for Police Lines. A small piece of land measuring 11.27 area (Block‑C) recorded in the Revenue Record of the Government of the Punjab is reportedly planned to be divided into residential plots by the Provincial Housing and Physical Planning Department. (3) In close proximity of Block‑C, residences of senior military Officers, including Chairman, J.C.S.C. and C.O.A.S. are located. It is felt that conversion of Block‑C into a small sized residential colony could pose a security hazard. Moreover, the area is too small for a housing colony and may have related environmental effects. (4) I would like to propose, as also requested by G.H.Q. that the Revenue Department Punjab may be directed to transfer the said land to the Federal Government and place the same under the management of the Rawalpindi Cantonment Board (RCB) in the Ministry of Defence for the purpose of a Public Park. Pending formal transfer of land, the management of this land may be transferred to R.C.B. (5) I may add that transfer/exchange of land between Federal and Provincial Governments is a routine affair. If desired, Federal/Defence land of equivalent value can be given in lieu of this land. (6) Lt.‑General Naseem Rana, former Director‑General I.S.I. had also discussed this case and you had very kindly agreed with the above contention and had assured to have the whole matter looked into. (7) I hope you will kindly have the matter examined and give a favourable decision on our submission. (Sd.) Lt. ‑Gen. (Retd.) Iftikhar Ali Khaa." Learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that originally the site of the Old Central Jail was earmarked for the establishment of the Housing Scheme by the Housing and Physical Planning Department arid the plots at that site having auctioned, the possession was also delivered to the allottees but subsequently, on the change of the Government, the Housing Scheme was disbanded in the said area and instead a park was established by the C.D.A. under the direction of Federal Government and the allottee of the said site were returned the principal amount with 12‑1/2% mark‑up as compensation. He frankly submitted that if the petitioners are treated at par, they are also prepared to surrender their rights in the area Development Scheme on the payment of compensation with 12‑1/2% mark up.

6. The Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division present in person while confirming the above state of affairs has acknowledged the return of the principal amount with payment of 12‑1/2% mark‑up to the allottees of the plots in the Area Development Scheme established at the site of Old Central Jail. However, according to him, the Housing and Physical Planning Department. Government of the Punjab due to non‑availability of funds would not be in a position to make payment to the petitioners and that the same should be arranged by the Federal Government. The learned Assistant Advocate‑General on instructions from the Deputy Director, Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab, who is also present in ‑Court has submitted that a summary has already been moved for the return of the principal amount paid by the allottees with payment of 12‑1/2% mark‑up to them as compensation. Learned counsel representing respondent No.8 and the learned Standing Counsel have submitted that the exchange of the land of the site in question with suitable land owned by the Ministry of Defence as described above shall be settled in due course of time with Provincial Government.

7. The establishment of Area Development Scheme known as Khayaban‑e‑Muhammad Ali Jinnah at Old Central Jail, Rawalpindi, was notified by the Government of Punjab. The scheme consisting upon three Blocks namely (A), (B) and (C) having introduced by the Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of Punjab for generation of funds, the development of the scheme was in progress when the area of Blocks "A" and "B" of the scheme was converted into the Jinnah Park whereas out of the area of Block "C" a few plots of the size of one Kanal each were auctioned by the Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab and the major portion of said Block was still available for sale through auction. On behalf of the Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan, it was brought to the notice of Government of Punjab that Block "C" of the Area Development Scheme in close proximity of Army House and residences of senior members of Defence Service would be a security hazard and a request was made for exchange of this land with the land under the control of Ministry of Defence. In consequence thereto, a joint meeting of the representatives of Government of Pakistan and the Ministry of Defence was arranged on 4th May, 2000, which was attended by the officers namely:‑‑ (1) The Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division. Rawalpindi. (2) Deputy Director Quart Ring, (Col. Aamir Jalees Ahmad) Q.M.G's. Branch, G:H.Q. Rawalpindi. (3) Station Headquarters, (Lt.‑Col. Shafiq Ahmad Khan, A.Q.), Rawalpindi. (4) Lt.‑Col. Iqbal Hussain Hashmi, Assistant J.A.G.,‑ J.A.G. Branch G.H.Q. Rawalpindi. (5) Mr. Muhammad Saeed Chaudhry, Deputy Director, Housing and Planning Government of Punjab, Rawalpindi. The following decisions were taken in the meeting:‑‑ (a) Q.M.G's. Branch will suggest/indicate three alternative sites of defence land for exchange with the Provincial Government at Old Central Jail Area Defence land may be offered at Rawalpindi Cantt. Area or Murree. (b) Deputy Director, Housing and Town Planning will visit the sites of Dhoke Syedan alongwith the representative of Qtg. Die GHQ, Station Headquarters and MEO Rawalpindi for assessment/valuation of the land. (c) The matter would be resolved as early as possible. It was further decided that the area in question would be kept open as a park and since Provincial Government Housing Scheme was abandoned, the same would not be replaced by a Housing Scheme by the Army.

8. It being a matter of common sense that the establishment of a Housing Scheme in such a sensitive area would definitely be a permanent source of insecurity to the area, the Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division, Rawalpindi and Deputy Director, Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab, who are present in Court on realizing the importance of the matter have frankly conceded that establishment of such a Housing Scheme in such locality being a threat to the security of the area would not be feasible and agreed for the exchange of this land with the land of Federal Government under the control of Ministry of Defence as proposed in the joint meeting of the representative of the Provincial Government and the Ministry of Defence. Learned counsel for the. petitioners on instructions from the petitioners who are present in person have stated that the petitioners are prepared to surrender their rights in the plots subject to the return of principal amount with 12‑1/2% mark‑up. The learned Standing Counsel for the Federal a Government, learned A.A.‑G. the Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division and Deputy Director, Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab, the learned counsel for Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi, and Lt.‑Col. Iqbal Hashmi. A.J.A.‑G., the representative of Ministry of Defence have readily consented nor the disposal of these petitions in the following terms:‑‑ (a) The petitioners hereby surrender their rights in the plots purchased by them in the Area Development Scheme subject to the return of principal amount with 12‑1/2% mark‑up with the option to accept the allotment of a suitable alternate plots in lieu thereof at the substituted site, if any. (b) The Provincial Government will surrender the proprietary rights in the land of Block "C" Area Development Scheme in favour of Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan, in exchange of any of the land owned by the said Ministry in Dhoke Syedan, Rawalpindi, (left west curtain Redoubt), Nougazi Camping ground's, Mandra and Gujjar Khan. (c) The control and management of the land of Block "C" Area Development Scheme with its possession shall vest in the Ministry of Defence and shall be deemed to have always been vested in the said Ministry. (d) That in terms of the decision taken in the joint meeting of the representatives of Government of Punjab and Ministry of Defence, the area in question shall be kept open as a park and shall be developed as such by the Rawalpindi Cantonment under the control of Ministry of Defence strictly in accordance with the provisions of Cantonment Act, 1924.

9. As envisaged under ‑Article 23 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it is right of every citizen to acquire, hold and Repub dispose of property in any part of Pakistan, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the public interest, but at the same time, the 6 private property of a person can be taken by the Government in the public interest with payment of compensation as provided under Article 24 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 since the property subject‑matter of the present petitions is located within the limits of Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi and no building in the cantonment area can be erected without the permission of cantonment Board as provided under c Chapter X1 of Cantonment. Act, 1924, therefore, the Cantonment Board without being owner of land can in such sensitive cases prohibit erection of building in exercise of its power under subsection (2),of section 181 of Cantonment Act, 1924, which is read as under: 181 (2) The Board may refuse to sanction the erection or re-erection of any building either on grounds sufficient in the opinion of the Board affecting the particular building or in pursuance of a general scheme sanctioned by the Competent Authority restricting the erection or re-erection of buildings within specified limits for the prevention of over‑crowding or in the interest of persons residing within such limits or for of any other public purpose."

10. The erection of buildings in this sensitive area being the permanent source of insecurity to the senior members of Defence Service can be prevented for public purpose and since the area is subject to control of Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi, therefore, its management by another authority except the Ministry of Defence would undo such purpose and further it is in the public as well as national interest that the said area should not be utilized for establishing the Housing Schemes either by the Provincial or the Federal Government and the concerned department in the Government of the Punjab in the light of the decision taken by the representatives of the Government of Punjab and Ministry of Defence and the agreement arrived at between the parties before this Court in the present petitions, for the return of principal amount with mark‑up to the petitioners and the exchange of the land under discussion with the proposed land of Ministry of Defence should take effective steps for an early implementation of the agreement in question.

11. In consequence to the above settlement between the parties, it is held that the land of Block "C" of Area Development Scheme in question shall vest to the Ministry of Defence and the said Ministry shall be entitled to 4 manage the land at the spot under the agreement and while giving priority to the matter will make efforts for the completion of the transaction of exchange of land without loss of time. The petitioners having surrender their proprietary rights in the land in question shall not claim any right, title and interest in the said land and shall be returned the principal amount paid by them as the price of the land with 12‑1/2% mark‑up by the Housing and Physical Planning Department, Government of the Punjab, within three months, failing which the petitioners shall be entitled to recover the said amount from the Provincial Government through process of law. These petitions stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Q.M.H./M.A.K./I‑30/L Order accordingly.