Home Maxims & Terms Decision meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Decision

Decision legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 MLD 1610 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Decision

Definition.

2022 CLD 502 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHI Judicial Precedent
Regln. 13DecisionSignatures on decisionScope

Initial Environmental Examination approval being a quasi-judicial and appealable order can only be passed and signed by the Director General of the Agency and the Deputy Director is not competent to sign the same.

2017 PTD 1181 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
"Decision"

Explained.

2015 PLD 272 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 67(3)Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionElection TribunalDecisionAssailing ofDecision of Election Tribunal to be assailed directly before the Supreme CourtGeneral ruleAssailing decision of Election Tribunal before the High Court under Art. 199 of the ConstitutionOnly exceptional

Challenging decision of an Election Tribunal before the High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution would make S.67(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 redundant to some extent as the parties in such situation would have to file petition for leave to appeal instead of direct appeal before the Supreme Court, which was not the intention of the legislature

When a mechanism had been provided for the decision of disputes arising out of elections, it could not be permitted to be bypassed through constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court

High Court could only exercise jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution (exceptionally) when the order of Election Tribunal was illegal and aggrieved person became remediless and the candidate had been disqualified and disfranchised

Only in extraordinary circumstances would the High Court deviate from the general sanctified rule.

2014 SCMR 1858 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 184(3)Constitutional petition under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution before the Supreme CourtDecisionNot appealable

Law had not provided for an appeal against a decision given by the Supreme Court under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution.

2010 SCMR 1778 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Basic ingredients

Three basic ingredients of every decision are findings of fact both direct and inferential; Statement of principles of law applicable to legal terms disclosed by facts and judgment passed on combined effect of the above ingredients.

2010 SCMR 539 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 4(2)Decision

Basic ingredients.

2009 PLD 879 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Basic ingredients of `decision' enumerated.

1994 SCMR 1635 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Decision

Decision which was not inter-parties was irrelevant so far as parties who were not impleaded therein were concerned.

1987 SCMR 1107 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 67Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115"Case decided"-DecisionAppeal

Appeal provision being hedged in by the requirement of a "decision" and the nature of decision suggested by reference to consequential orders in S. 67(1), Representation of the People Act, 1976, appeal is competent only against those decisions which conform to such enumerated or specified orders

Analogy of "case decided" mentioned in S . 115, C . P. C . was altogether different power which power was manifestly conceded for exercising superintendence and control and was confined to those orders in which no appeal lay.

[Appeal (civil)].

1973 PLD 236 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Finality given by Legislature to decision of certain Tribunal which also has jurisdiction to decide finally facts upon which its own jurisdiction founded-Decision, in such case, cannot be called into question in any collateral proceeding by another tribunal or body of limited jurisdiction.

1962 PLD 151 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Decision Judicial decision primarily applies to facts on which it is given

1962 PLD 68 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Decision Judicial decision is meant primarily to apply to facts on consideration of which it was given.

1962 PLD 368 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Precedent-Decision-Authority only for points mooted anti decided.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Decision", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14143

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decision"

PTD 1997
I.T.A. No. 320/KB of 1991-92 and M.A. (RECT) No. 80/KB of 1995-96 decided on 7th January, 1997.

1997 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLC 1987
Application No.79 of 1985, decided on 31st March, 1987.

1987 P L C 764

S. DILDAR ALI Versus UNITED BANK Ltd.

Court: IIIrd Labour Court Sind
CLD 2023
2023-September-27

2023 C L D 1365

CHINA WATER AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION (CWE) P.R. CHINA — Applicant Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PLC 1971
Appeals Nos.' LHR-40, 151, 152, 199 and 205 of 1970, decided on 3rd November 1970.

1971 PLC 179

OTHERS Versus THE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE

Court: High Court
PLC 1971
Appeals Nos. LHR. 40, 151, 152, 199, 205 and 18, 19, 36 and‑28 of 1970, decided on 3rd November 1970.

1971 P L C 160

EMPLOYEES' UNION (RECD.), LYALLPUR AND 11 OTHERS Versus THE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE

Court: Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal
PLD 1996
Constitutional Petition No.963, Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 2415, 2416 and 2417 of 1996, decided on 24th June, 1996.

P L D 1996 Karachi 513

and another ‑‑‑ Petitioners. Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH,

Court:
MLD 2025
2025-May-16

2025 M L D 1610

Malik Muhammad Akram Bhatti — Petitioner Versus Nadeem Abbas and 16 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1953
Appeal No. 3 of 1952 against the order of District Judge, Mirpur dated the 17th February, 1952.

P L D 1953 Azad J

NOOK HUSSAIN etc.‑Appellants Versus MUKHAM DIN etc.‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1993
Original Petitions Nos. 5335, 5446 and 5447 of 1990-S, decided on 4th June, 1992.

1993 P T D 1502

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus KONTIKI CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT.) LTD.

Court: Kerala High Court (India)
PTD 1993
ITAs. Nos.180/IB, 198/IB, 199/113, 205/113 and 206/113 of 1992-93, decided on 27th April, 1993.

1993 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan