Home Maxims & Terms Security risk meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Security risk

Security risk legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 CLD 222 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(xxxv), 12 & 33, Schedules I & II

Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2000, Regln. 5

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199

Constitutional petition

Environmental assessment

Commercialization

Withdrawal of permission

Security risk

Proof

Petitioners intended to raise commercial cum residential building on a commercial plot but District authorities withdrew the status of plot as commercial on the plea that it was security risk as a Jamat Khana (religious building) was in its vicinity

Validity

Withdrawal of commercialization status of plot on the ground that construction which would be raised on such plot would be a "security risk" did not fall within the domain of District authorities

Building approval was an act subsequent to and independent of the status of the plot

Declaration of District authorities to such effect could not sustain unless it had statutory backing such as in the cases of key point installations all those structures, installations, factories or other establishments which were of vital importance to country in its readiness and ability to fight a war and the event of whose destruction or severe damage, the loss would impair vital national war effort

Provincial Government or Central Government had the prerogative to prohibit construction within a specified parameters for the safety of such construction/installation

Environmental Impact Studies presupposed planning and zoning

Once planning and zoning had taken place or changed then such entry could not be applied against the proponent of a project which had undertaken construction or installation in consonance to such change

Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency could require such proponent to file Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) by invoking any specific entry in either of the Schedules

Order passed by District Authorities to the extent of withdrawing commercial status of plot in question on the ground of being "security risk" to Jamat Khana (religious building) was mala fide and without jurisdiction and was set aside

Petition was allowed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Security risk", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944774

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Security risk"

GBLR 2010
2010-October-6

2010 GBLR 414

S.M.C. No.8 of 2010

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
CLCN 2019
2015-April-22

2019 C L C Note 20

ZAKA ULLAH MALIK — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2006
N/A

P L D 2006 Lahore 384

WAPDA and others — Petitioners Versus FAROOQ and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1974
Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1974, decided on 14th October 1974.

P L D 1974 Supreme Court 402

THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND 3 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus Malik GHULAM JILANI‑Respondent

Court:
CLD 2014
2013-October-24

2014 C L D 222

SALIM GODIL and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2019
2018-October-31

2019 C L D 294

CONTROL RISK (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR COMPANIES REGISTRATION OFFICE SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2019
Civil Petition No. 2669 of 2016, decided on 31st October, 2018.

2019 S C M R 365

CONTROL RISK (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR COMPANIES REGISTRATION OFFICE SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2001
Writ Petitions Nos.938, 939 and 884 of 1999, decided on 4th July, 2000.

2001 C L C 533

IKRAM‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning

Court: Lahore
PLD 2015
2014-March-4

P L D 2015 Sindh 279

MISRI KHAN and 10 others — Petitioners Versus MANAGER, DARGAH HAZRAT ABDULLAH SHAH GHAZI, KARACHI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2001
Writ Petitions Nos.546 and 547 of 2000, decided on 16th March, 2001.

P L D 2001 Azad J&K 33

ALI ASGHAR ABBASI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL through

Court: