Home Maxims & Terms Adjudication of dispute meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Adjudication of dispute

Adjudication of dispute legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLD 108 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 7Interpretation of S.7, Companies Ordinance, 1984Jurisdiction of High CourtAdjudication of disputeScope

Section 7 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 no doubt vested original civil jurisdiction with the High Court, however, context or meaning of "original civil jurisdiction" was that jurisdiction as conferred by statute, and in contradiction to criminal jurisdiction

Companies Ordinance, 1984 specifically mentioned "the court" where it empowered "the court" to exercise jurisdiction

Expression "having jurisdiction" meant that the High Court was the authorized legal authority to hear and determine issues under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, but S.7 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 did not necessitate the High Court to adjudicate upon all disputes which arose under the Companies Ordinance, 1984

Wherever it was required under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, specific sections provided that the High Court shall adjudicate upon a matter.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Adjudication of dispute", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939557

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Adjudication of dispute"

CLC 2003
2002-August-27

2003 C L C 1016

MIR SHAH MUHAMMAD GABOL — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLC 1988
Petition No.45 of 1977, decided on 22nd November, 1979.

1988 P L C 768

GRINDLAYS BANK EMPLOYEES' UNION (REGISTERED) Versus GRINDLAYS BANK LTD.

Court: VIth Labour Court Punjab
YLR 2013
C.Ms. Nos.1156-C/R and 656-C/95 in Civil Revision No.474-D of 1994, decided on 4th December, 2012.

2013 Y L R 565

NOORANG — Petitioner Versus UMAR DARAZ and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1991
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.528-R of 1989, decided on 26th March, 1990.

1991 S C M R 1147

AL-QASIM TRADERS — Petitioner Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 2023
2022-April-5

2023 M L D 323

INTERWORLD COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED through Authorized Representative — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman, PTA and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PTD 1994
Civil Appeal No.1193 of 1977, decided on 17th March, 1993.

1993 P T D 409

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (ADDL.) Versus T. NAGGIREDDY

Court: 202 I T R 253
CLC 1994
Transfer Applications Nos. 536‑C, 537‑C and 568‑C of 1993, heard on 21st November, 1993.

1994 C L C 705

Mst. RUQIA BEGUM (BATOOL)‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUAHMMAD ISHTIAQ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No.203 of 1986, decided on 21st March, 1989.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 211

MOAMBAR‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY HOME for Government of N.‑W.F.P.

Court:
CLC 1989
Writ Petition No.2 of 1988. heard on 16th October, 1988.

1989 C L C 22

Dr. IMDAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. NAWAB JAHAN BEGUM and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2017
2017-February-2

2017 C L C 767

MUHAMMAD ASIF — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore