Stage of proceedings
Stage of proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Any document that was genuine and relevant to the determination of a factual controversy may be admitted on record at any stage of the proceedings, whether original or appellate, so that justice may be done.
Court had ample authority and discretion to allow amendment of pleadings in appropriate cases, which authority could be exercised at any stage of the proceedings in the trial, and in certain cases amendments could be permitted at the stage of appeal or even in revisional jurisdiction.
No particular juncture/stage was provided in the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 for filing an application under S.265-K, Cr.P.C and it was the idiosyncrasy of an accused to make such an application and the judicial wisdom of the court seized of the matter to take into account as to whether the application so filed could be disposed of in view of the material on record.
"Stage of proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939643
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stage of proceedings"
1986 M L D 1307
MUHAMMAD SALEEM — Petitioner Versus Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR and another Respondents
Court: Karachi1994SCMR2031
HAROON MIRZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JAWAD MIR MUHAMMADI and 14 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1980 S C M R 324
HAQ NAWAZ-Petitioner Versus Kh. SHAIQ HASSAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: -- Art. 188-Review-Petitioner seeking review on sole ground of hav ing discovered subsequently respondent having been transferee of an other shop in addition to one subject-matter of litigation-Caveator, however, appearing in person and stating to have obtained such shop in auction and acquisition being not hit by any provision of law-Peti tioner having no locus standi to challenge earlier transfer in favour of caveator, inappropriate for him, held to seek review on a fresh ground not urged at any stage of proceedings-Supreme. Court Rules, 1956, O. XXVI.-Review.2025 C L C 223
MUHAMMAD NAJEEB — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE MIRPUR, AZAD KASHMIR and others — Respondents
Court: High Court (AJ&K)P L D 1979 Lahore 469
MRs. FEROZA ASLAM-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: S. 2-Intra-Court Appeal-Rent Controller setting aside ex parte order of ejectment and finding necessary to associate tenant in proceedings in circumstances of case-Conclusion of Rent Controller as well as circumstances leading to such conclusion being open to review on grounds of fact and law when appeal preferred against final order interference at intermediary stage of proceedings declined and adjudication on merits rather than on technicalities preferred, -Intra-Court appeal.1989 M L D 2713
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2018 Balochistan 34
Mst. RASHIDA — Petitioner Versus Mst. ZEENAT and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2006 P T D 1085
Messrs NIDA-I-MILLAT (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE NO.1, LAHORE
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2006 S C M R 526
Messrs NIDA-I-MILLAT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE — Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE NO.1, LAHORE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1994 S C M R 1945
ALLAH BAKHSH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. FATHE BIBI‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan