1994SCMR2031 (PLP)
HAROON MIRZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JAWAD MIR MUHAMMADI and 14 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994SCMR2031 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Fazal Ilahi Khan |
| Parties | HAROON MIRZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JAWAD MIR MUHAMMADI and 14 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994SCMR2031 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994SCMR2031 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Fazal Ilahi Khan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994SCMR2031 (PLP) (HAROON MIRZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JAWAD MIR MUHAMMADI and 14 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mujeebur Rehman, Advocate instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 23rd November, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 3‑11‑1993 of the Sindh High Court, Karachi passed in Misc. Application No. 1220 of 1993 in Constitutional Petition No. 3/1092/92). ‑‑‑‑O.XXXIX, R. 2(3)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑High Court issuing notice to petitioner to show cause as to why action should not be taken against him for violating order of status quo passed by High Court and why he should not be punished for having committed contempt of Court‑‑‑No final order had been passed and matter was still pending in the High Court‑‑ No good ground was made out for interference by Supreme Court at the preliminary stage of proceedings‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the order dated 3‑11‑1993 of the Sindh High Court, Karachi passed in Misc. Application No. 1220 of 1993 in Constitutional Petition No. 3/1092/92). ‑‑‑‑O.XXXIX, R. 2(3)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑High Court issuing notice to petitioner to show cause as to why action should not be taken against him for violating order of status quo passed by High Court and why he should not be punished for having committed contempt of Court‑‑‑No final order had been passed and matter was still pending in the High Court‑‑ No good ground was made out for interference by Supreme Court at the preliminary stage of proceedings‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances. Mujeebur Rehman, Advocate instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd November, 1993. NASIM HASAN SHAH, CJ: ‑‑This is a petition seeking leave to appeal against an interlocutory order whereby the petitioner herein was issued a notice to show cause why action should not be taken against him for violating an order of status quo passed by the High Court and why he should not be punished for having committed Contempt of the Court. No final order has been passed and the matter is still pending in the High Court.
2. No good ground is made out for interference by this Court at this stage of the proceedings.
3. Dismissed. A.A./H‑190/S Leave refused.