Power to review
Power to review legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
General rule was that power to review was a statutory power and no court or authority could exercise such power unless specifically conferred by law
Said general rule had two exceptions: Firstly where a court had an inherent jurisdiction to set aside judgment or order which it had delivered without jurisdiction, and secondly where court or authority had the power to review an order or judgment obtained by fraud
High Court in exercise of criminal jurisdiction was also competent to exercise power of review conferred upon it by the Letters Patent besides its inherent jurisdiction
"Power to review", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939757
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Power to review"
2001 M L D 665
Messrs KASUR OIL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, LAW,
Court: Lahore1989 C L C 1934
AFFAN JAN MIRZA‑‑Appellant Versus Mrs. NAZNEEN ESSA‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2013 Lahore 123
MANZOOR AHMAD and 2 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and 18 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1984 C L C 2347
TAYYAB‑ — Petitioner Versus THS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER/SETTLEMENT COMMIS
Court: Karachi1992 P L C (C
M.S. TARIQ and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 3 others
Court: Service Tribunal Sindh2010 P L C 1
Mst. NOOR BEGUM Versus COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT and 2 others
Court: Karachi High Court2018 C L C 1955
KHALID RASHID SHEIKH and others — Petitioners Versus JUDICIAL OFFICER, PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION and others — Respondents
Court: LahorePLD 1990 Supreme Court 95
SIRAJ DIN‑‑ Appellant Versus Civil Appeal No. 743 of 1984, decided on 28th September 1989.
Court: (a) West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 M.L.R. 64‑‑2002 C L C 1850
DILNAWAZ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus Miss AMBAR GULL KHAN ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1987 S C M R 899
S. SARWAT HAIDER and another‑‑Appellants Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑S. 4‑‑Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1974‑‑Powers of Service Tribunal‑‑ Review‑‑Service Tribunal, held, was not invested with powers to review its own orders under any circumstance.‑‑Review.