Conversion of offence
Conversion of offence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial Court had not considered the evidence produced by the prosecution minutely and without going into the spirit of law mentioned in S.237, Cr.P.C., only converted the offence under S.17(3) of Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 into sections punishable under Ss.392 and 394, P.P.C. without framing the charge, and without giving the opportunity to accused to defend himself, was quite against the canon of law and procedure.
"Conversion of offence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940291
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conversion of offence"
1989 S C M R 909
N/A
Court: High Court1981 S C M R 372
MUHAMMAD ANWAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: S. 302-Murder-case--Appreciation of evidence Prosecution witnesses related to accused petitioner-False implication in circum stances inconceivable - Son of one of prosecution witnesses if admitted to have really killed deceased (his own sister) (as suggested by petitioner's counsel) due to having found her with paramour, eye witnesses, if they wanted to falsely implicate any body, would have named such paramour as murderer-Discrepancy on question of time elapsing between injuries and death discoverable from medical evidence and ocular account not of such type as to necessitate reappraisal of evidence particularly when based upon hypothesis -Prosecution evidence not suffering from any infirmity requiring interference - Petition, held, without force as far as conviction concerned.2013 Y L R 1311
SHAFQAT — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: SindhP L D 2003 Supreme Court 891
STATE through Deputy Prosecutor-General, Camp Office, Karachi — Petitioner Versus RAMESH M. UDESHI, EX-SECRETARY, BOARD OF REVENUE (LAND UTILIZATION), SINDH and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2013 P Cr
Mst. TAHSEEN and 2 others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU and 5 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1988 Federal Shariat Court 105
Mst. ZARINA and another appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court:1980 P Cr
DAYA‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2002 P Cr
RAMESH M. UDESHI‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2013 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SULEMAN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: SindhP L D 1967 Supreme Court 334
MRS. C. M. SAMUEL‑Appellant Versus (1) MR. C. SAMUEL AND
Court: