Home Maxims & Terms Intention of parties meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Intention of parties

Intention of parties legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Intention of parties", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124941672

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Intention of parties"

CLC 1981
Second Appeal No. 249 of 1974, decided on 25th February, 1980.

1981 C L C 662

DR. RAZIA WAHID‑Appellant Versus SHAH DIN AND 6 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1981
Second Appeal No. 178 of 1979, decided on 18th October, 1980.

1981 C L C 656

DR. SAKINA TAPAL‑Appellant Versus Mst. RASHIDA BANO‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1995
Civil Revision No. 217‑D of 1989, heard on 13th July, 1994.

1995 C L C 105

Mst. IOBAL BEGUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2015
N/A

2015 Y L R 2562

TAJ DEEN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD TUFAIL and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2010
2009-April-22

2010 C L D 324

HAQ NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus ABDUL KHALIQ — Defendant

Court: Lahore
MLD 1989
First Rent Appeal No.399 of 1986, decided on 26th February, 1989.

1989 M L D 4529

Syed FAZLE ABBAS — Appellant Versus Syed MAHMOOD HUSSAIN — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1954
Civil Second Appeal No. 24 of 1953 decided on 5th June, 1954 against the order of Senior Sub‑Judge, Bahawalpur, dated the 26th August, 1953.

P L D 1954 Baghdad﷓ul﷓Jadid 51

IBRAHIM and others‑Defendants‑Appellants Versus SARDAR AHMAD and others‑Plaintiffs‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1978
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 21-R of 1978, decided on 3rd April 1978.

1978 S C M R 278

MESSRS OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-Petitioner Versus MESSRS KARACHI BUILDERS — Respondent

Court: --- S. 8-Arbitrator-Appointment--One condition of contract as laid down in standard agreement form being to refer any dispute between parties to arbitration of Chief Engineer of petitioner-Corpo ration but by special condition entered in tender form term "Chief Engineer" was to be read as "Production Engineer" -Deputy Chief Engineer of Corporation performing additional duties of Produc tion Manager taking up arbitration and deciding case against respon dents ex parte-Held Intention of parties being to appoint Production Manager as arbitrator and not any other officer performing functions of Production Manager in addition to his own duties, Deputy Chief Engineer incompetent to arbitrate and award rightly set aside. Arbitrator-Award.
MLD 1993
Civil Revision No.69‑D of 1992, heard on 12th May, 1992.

1993 M L D 439

GHULAM NABI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SARFRAZ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1987
Revision Application No. 12 of 1986, decided on 11th December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Karachi 132

Mst. KHATOON BEGUM‑Applicant Versus Mst. BARKATUNNISA BEGUM AND 6 others‑Respondents

Court: