1981 PLP 662 (CLC)
DR. RAZIA WAHID‑Appellant Versus SHAH DIN AND 6 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 662 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J |
| Parties | DR. RAZIA WAHID‑Appellant Versus SHAH DIN AND 6 OTHERS‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 662 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 662 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 662 (CLC) (DR. RAZIA WAHID‑Appellant Versus SHAH DIN AND 6 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mushtaque Memon for Appellant.
- Mustafa Lakhani for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 25th February, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 13‑Eviction of tenant‑Security deposit‑Refund‑Lease agree ment manifesting intention of parties as to security deposit being in first instance applied for cost of repairs to house in question and providing for its refund on tenant's vacating house‑Tenant not vacating house‑Security deposit, held, not refundable and question of application of deposit in satisfaction of accruing rent out of question. Syed Shafiuddln v. Abdul Hakim Khan P L D 1978 Kar 149 fol. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) _‑‑ S. 2(i)‑Tenancy, continuation of‑Agreement of tenancy for 11 moths not registered‑Tenant continuing to occupy premises after 11; months‑Agreement, held, did not require registration and tenant continued in possession as tenant even after 11 months. Muhammad Sharif v. Muhammad Sharif and 3 others P L D 1971 Lah. 610 rel.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑ S. 13‑Eviction of tenant‑Security deposit‑Refund‑Lease agree ment manifesting intention of parties as to security deposit being in first instance applied for cost of repairs to house in question and providing for its refund on tenant's vacating house‑Tenant not vacating house‑Security deposit, held, not refundable and question of application of deposit in satisfaction of accruing rent out of question. Syed Shafiuddln v. Abdul Hakim Khan P L D 1978 Kar 149 fol. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) _‑‑ S. 2(i)‑Tenancy, continuation of‑Agreement of tenancy for 11 moths not registered‑Tenant continuing to occupy premises after 11; months‑Agreement, held, did not require registration and tenant continued in possession as tenant even after 11 months. Muhammad Sharif v. Muhammad Sharif and 3 others P L D 1971 Lah. 610 rel. Mushtaque Memon for Appellant. Mustafa Lakhani for Respondents. Date of hearing : 25th February, 1980.