Satisfaction
Satisfaction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Comparison.
Word "satisfaction" when used in the context of judicial proceedings has to be arrived at with the prescribed statutory provisions
To be satisfied means to be honestly covinced.
Connotation of.
"Satisfaction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1547
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Satisfaction"
1993 C L C 1398
M/s. HILAL TANNERIES LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN,
Court: Lahore2000 P T D 2519
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Smt. P. M. CELINE
Court: 236 I T R 988P L D 1970 Dacca 422
FARID AHMED‑-Petitioner Versus THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (GENL.), DACCA AND 2 OTHERS‑-Respondents
Court:1992 C L C 1211
IBRAHIM ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus NOOR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1999 P T D 3308
JOGINDER SINGH SODHI Versus HUTESH DOGRA and others
Court: 236 I T R 817P L D 1994 Azad J&K 8
ABDUL GHANI‑‑‑Appellant Versus RASIB KHAN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ---O. XXI, R. 2‑‑‑"Decree" as used in O. XXI, R. 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908‑‑‑Connotation‑‑‑"Decree" in O.XXI, R.2, C.P.C. refers to all kinds of decrees and not only to money decrees‑‑Decree of any kind" used in R.2 of O.XXI, C.P.C. would be construed in comprehensive manner so as to include all decrees, not expressly provided anywhere else in Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Words and phrases.P L D 1978 Lahore 214
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF-Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNTAENT OF PUNJAB AND 3 others — Respondents
Court: -- S. 3(1)(2) read with S. 26-Reference to Provincial Government-Satisfaction- Delegates District Magistrate (delegated power under S. 26) not required to refer matter to Provincial Government with regard to prejudicial activity of a person before passing detention order against such person-Question of satisfaction-Cannot be considered strictly separate from power to arrest a person-Satisfaction of District Magistrate-Condition precedent to making order for detention-District Magistrate, held, fully empowered to make arrest matter of satisfaction exclusively within his jurisdiction, and no legal obligation to refer matter for satisfaction of Government -Liaqat Ali v. Government of Sind P L D 1973 Kar. 78 dissented from.-Preventive detention -Delegation of authority.2011 SCMR 318
Mst. NAJMA BEGUM and others — Petitioners Versus REHMAT ALI (decd) through L.Rs. and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1974 Quetta 21
MUHAMMAD ZARIF KHAN-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN-Respondent
Court: ---S. 145 (I)-Expression "he shall make an order in writing, stating the grounds of his being so satisfied"-Satisfaction of Magistrate about apprehension of peace-Condition precedent for assuming jurisdiction-Such satisfaction cannot be proved by subsequent event nor can be based on something not on record---Magistrate failing to record his satisfaction under S. 145 (1)---Not easy, in such circumstances, for superior Court to discover whether essential condition of his being satisfied that apprehension of breach existed had been fulfilled-Save in some very unusual and exceptional circumstances, Magistrate's satisfaction under S. 145 (I) cannot be proved in absence of express statement in that respect in his order-Proceed ings under S. 145 are of criminal nature and accused never estopped from pleading bar of jurisdiction in criminal cases-Mere fact that a person had joined proceeding under S. 145 and participated in it-----No bar to his pleading bar of jurisdiction before superior Court---Gujarkhan---Rawalpindi Muslim Transport Co v. Asghar Ali P L D 1966 Lah. 435 dissented from.1999 M L D 2924
Jam MUNIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus INCHARGE, CIVIL PRISON, SADIQABAD, DISTRICT RAHIMYAR KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore