CLC 1981

1981 PLP 725 (CLC)

GHULAM SIDDIQUE‑Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE. BOLAN MEDICAL COLLEGE

Jurisdiction / Court
Quetta
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. 140 of 1979, decided on 11th November, 1979.
Honorable Judges
Mir Khuda Bukhsh Marri, C. J. and Zakaullah Lodhi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 725 (CLC)
Forum / Court Quetta
Bench Members Mir Khuda Bukhsh Marri, C. J. and Zakaullah Lodhi, J
Parties GHULAM SIDDIQUE‑Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE. BOLAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 725 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 725 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Quetta bench comprising: Mir Khuda Bukhsh Marri, C. J. and Zakaullah Lodhi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 725 (CLC) (GHULAM SIDDIQUE‑Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE. BOLAN MEDICAL COLLEGE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Khalid Malik for Petitioner.
  • Muhammad Yousaf, Asstt. A: G. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
  • Date of hearing: 30th October, 1979.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Educational institutionsProspectus of Bolan Medical College (1979), r. 27‑Peti tioner surrendering his local certificate from District Q before his interview by Selection Committee and producing permanent residence certificate from District Magistrate at K‑Sanads from former ruler of K as well as certain other documents showing petitioner having possessed immovable property in District k‑Documents sufficient for Selection Committee to be satisfied as to petitioner being a bona fide local of K District‑Adverse decision of Selection Committee without considering documents and without giving reasons for refusing to accept petitioner's claim of being a bona fide resident of K District held, arbitrary and open to interferenceOrder of Committee not showing what benefit petitioner gained or what right he infringed or what manipulation, cheating or fraud, he did, petitioner, held, cannot be deprived of his birth right of being a local of K District‑Order of Selection Committee being illegal and without jurisdiction set aside. (b) Educational institutions‑ ‑‑ Prospectus of Bolan Medical College (1979)‑Selection Committee Selection Committee being an administrative body though not expected to pass fulfiedged order discussing each and every detail of case before it yet also not absolved of responsibility to take into account and discuss such aspects of case upon which a candidate's selection mainly depended.

Judgment & Decree

Constitutional Petition No. 140 of 1979, decided on 11th November, 1979. (a) Educational institutionsProspectus of Bolan Medical College (1979), r. 27‑Peti tioner surrendering his local certificate from District Q before his interview by Selection Committee and producing permanent residence certificate from District Magistrate at K‑Sanads from former ruler of K as well as certain other documents showing petitioner having possessed immovable property in District k‑Documents sufficient for Selection Committee to be satisfied as to petitioner being a bona fide local of K District‑Adverse decision of Selection Committee without considering documents and without giving reasons for refusing to accept petitioner's claim of being a bona fide resident of K District held, arbitrary and open to interferenceOrder of Committee not showing what benefit petitioner gained or what right he infringed or what manipulation, cheating or fraud, he did, petitioner, held, cannot be deprived of his birth right of being a local of K District‑Order of Selection Committee being illegal and without jurisdiction set aside. (b) Educational institutions‑ ‑‑ Prospectus of Bolan Medical College (1979)‑Selection Committee Selection Committee being an administrative body though not expected to pass fulfiedged order discussing each and every detail of case before it yet also not absolved of responsibility to take into account and discuss such aspects of case upon which a candidate's selection mainly depended. Khalid Malik for Petitioner. Muhammad Yousaf, Asstt. A: G. for Respondents Nos. 1 and

2. Date of hearing: 30th October, 1979.