1981 PLP 86 (CLC)
DILBAR‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 86 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Khurshid Khan, J |
| Parties | DILBAR‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 86 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 86 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Muhammad Khurshid Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 86 (CLC) (DILBAR‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 15(4) read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100 Second appeal‑Court of first appeal‑Competent to enter into question of fact and decide whether findings of fact by lower Court erroneous or not‑Court of second appeal however not competent to entertain questions as to soundness of a finding of fact by Court below‑Second appeal lies against substantial error or defect‑Erroneous finding of fact‑Different thing from an error or defect in procedure‑Decision as to credibility of witness Neither an error of law nor of procedure hence cannot furnish a ground for second appeal.‑[Second appeal].
Judgment & Decree
versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Respondents Second Appeal from Original Order No. 3 of 1979, decided on 13th April, 1980.
S. 15(4) read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100 Second appeal‑Court of first appeal‑Competent to enter into question of fact and decide whether findings of fact by lower Court erroneous or not‑Court of second appeal however not competent to entertain questions as to soundness of a finding of fact by Court below‑Second appeal lies against substantial error or defect‑Erroneous finding of fact‑Different thing from an error or defect in procedure‑Decision as to credibility of witness Neither an error of law nor of procedure hence cannot furnish a ground for second appeal.‑[Second appeal].