Satisfaction of authorities
Satisfaction of authorities legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Edifice of satisfaction is to be built on foundation of evidence, as conjectural presumption cannot be equated to that of "satisfaction", and it is subjective assessment and there can be no objective satisfaction
In exercise of jurisdiction under Art.199 of the Constitution, if High Court comes to conclusion that grounds mentioned in detention order are not supported by sufficient material, then there is nothing to stop High Court from exercising power of judicial review.
"Satisfaction of authorities", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942122
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Satisfaction of authorities"
1983 S C M R 726
ABDUL MAJEED-Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB-Respondent
Court: - Art. 185 (3)-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court-Question of fact tentatively decided against petitioner by three Courts by reference to record made available by parties-Held, cannot be determined by Supreme Court even for purposes of interim relief.-Question of fact.1988 P L C (C
MASAM KHAN Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, MARDAN
Court: Service Tribunal N: W.F.P.2011 M L D 1644
SHAMAN MAL — Petitioner Versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1995 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASLAM and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court2016 G B L R 49
Mst. SHABNAM RIAZ — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT/GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Appellate Court2000 P L C (C
KHALID MAHMOOD Versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PROVINCIAL
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab1991 M L D 8
SAID AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Home and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1997 P L C (C
MANZOOR HUSSAIN, NAIB‑TEHSILDAR and 13 others Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, LAYYAH and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court2013 P Cr
JAMEEL AHMAD — Petitioner Versus HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahorePLD 1987 Lahore 145
Before Amjad Khan ,J Versus Ch. ABDUL REHMAN GILL AND 7 OTHERS — Respondents
Court: --- S. 149-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Ss. 13 & 15-Ejectment of tenant on ground of bona fide personal requirement-Appeal against order of Rent Controller Negligible deficiency in court-fee-Effect-Deficiency in court-fee in absence of contumaciousness and negligence on the part of a party, held, could be got made up by Court under provisions of S. 149, C. P. C.-Matter of court-fee being a matter between subject and the State, a litigant could not be allowed to use it as a weapon of technicality against his adversary.-Court-fee.