Determination of place of jurisdiction
Determination of place of jurisdiction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Wife/applicant filed suit for recovery of maintenance allowance at place "L", whereas husband had filed suit for restitution of conjugal rights before Family Court at place "S"
Contention of the wife was that per S.7 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and Rule 6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, the forum for adjudication of both suits should situate at the place convenient for the wife
Held, that forum of convenience of wife took precedence for the purpose of determination of a family dispute covered by the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964
Application was allowed, in circumstances.
"Determination of place of jurisdiction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942515
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of place of jurisdiction"
2013 C L C 1595
MAH JABEEN — Applicant Versus TAHIR MAHMOOD — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2014 Lahore 317
SHAHIDA PARVEEN — Applicant Versus ZAFAR IQBAL — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1960 (W
MUMTAZ BEGUM‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus Ch. ZULFIQAR ALI‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court:2016 Y L R Note 83
Mst. MUKHTIARA and 3 others — Petitioners Versus ALIF KHAN and 11 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2019 P T D 301
DIRECTOR GENERAL CUSTOMS VALUATION and another Versus Messrs AL-AMIN CERA
Court: Sindh High CourtP L D 1985 Lahore 494
ILAHI BAKHSH AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus Mst. BALQEES BEGUM-Respondent
Court: -- S. 18-Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), S. 3-Determination of forum of appeal-Supreme Court taking prima facie view of matter and giving no final determination-Such leave refusing order, held, could not alter legal position settled in string of rulings.Precedent.P L D 2026 Peshawar 129
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and others — Petitioners Versus AHLIAN JABAN DARGAI through representatives and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1980 Lahore 471
MOOR MUHAMMAD AND 3, Other Appellants Versus Mst. KANIZ FATIMA AND 8 Others-Respondents
Court: Ss. 3, 4 & 8-Pre-emotion-Valuation-Jurisdiction - Suits for pre-emotion of land-Governed by S. 3 of Act (VII of 1887)-Value of land for jurisdictional purpose-To be determined in accordance with rules if made by Provincial Government--Court Fees Act VII of 1870, S. 7 (v) & (vi).-Pre-emotion-Jurisdiction.P L D 1965 Supreme Court 698
MR. MUHAMMAD JAMIL ASGHAR‑ ‑Appellant Versus THE IMROVEMENT TRUST, RAWALPINDI ‑‑ Respondent
Court:1980 C L C 1059
MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN AND 3 OTHERS-Appellants Versus SARDAR KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Lahore