Dual citizenship
Dual citizenship legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Record indicated that the respondent-candidate submitted his nomination papers on 10.6.2018 and filed the relevant affidavit in such regard on 11.6.2018
Two days later, he renounced his foreign citizenship on 13.6.2018
On the day the respondent filed his nominated papers he had not renounced his foreign citizenship and was a foreign citizen
Even, if it was assumed that the application of renunciation of foreign citizenship had been filed earlier, no disclosure of the same had been made by the respondent in the relevant column of the affidavit
Respondent had filed a false affidavit and made a false declaration on oath, therefore, he was disqualified from contesting elections
Appeal was allowed accordingly.
Nomination papers of the appellant for the Provincial Assembly were rejected on the ground that at the time of filing of nomination papers, the appellant was a citizen of the USA
Contention of the appellant was that he had surrendered his US citizenship before filing his nomination papers and produced a letter written by him addressed to the US Consulate as proof thereof
Validity
Contention of the appellant could not be accepted as the appellant had only moved an application for renouncing/ surrendering his foreign citizenship and the US Authorities were still to pass an order upon the appellant's application and the appellant had failed to show any response from the US Consulate
Appellant therefore, at the time of filing of his nomination papers and at the time of the scrutiny of said documents, still held the citizenship of the another country
No illegality existed in the impugned order and the candidature of the appellant was hit by Art.113 read with Art.63(1)(c) of the Constitution
Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Dual citizenship", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942589
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dual citizenship"
P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1089
Syed MEHMOOD AKHTAR NAQVI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2012 Supreme Court 1054
Syed MEHMOOD AKHTAR NAQVI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN throughSecretary Law and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2016 S C M R 430
ZAHID IQBAL — Petitioner Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD ADNAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1989 M L D 4719
Mrs. JAVED BUTT — Petitioner Versus III A.D.J. (EAST) KARACHI and others — Respondents
Court: Karachi2013 S C M R 461
Dr. MUHAMMAD TAHIR-UL-QADRI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/O Law, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 S C M R 1952
SHER BAZ KHAN GAADHI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2013 S C M R 1246
SADIQ ALI MEMON — Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER, NA-237, THATTA-I and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2012 S C M R 1101
Syed MEHMOOD AKHTAR NAQVI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2002 Lahore 521
UMAR AHMAD GHUMMAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: In order to ascertain the true meaning of the Legislature it is necessary to ascertain the circumstances with reference to which the words were used and what was the object appearing from those circumstances which the Legislature had in view.P L D 2019 Supreme Court 201
Suo Motu Case No.8 of 2018 regarding dua Nationality of Parliamentarians and Civil Misc. Application No.649-L of 2018 impleadment application by Shahzad Ali Khan in Suo Motu Case No.8 of 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan