Decision of Election Tribunal
Decision of Election Tribunal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Adjudication in appeal proceedings by the Supreme Court at the apex level was distinct and different from decision/findings of Domestic Tribunals, not because of hierarchy but because of the statutory powers available to an appellate court under S.67 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976
Adjudication of an issue, which was a continuous bone of contention between the parties could not be postponed even if there was a lapse of a period of 10 years ; and particularly when a candidate had to prove his/her credentials in terms of Arts. 62 & 63 of the Constitution to establish that no objection/attack was actionable against him or her, both before as well as after entering the Parliament or the Provincial Assembly
Court could intervene in the election of such candidates, who were found to be disqualified, even after having been elected as members of Parliament, and their election could subsequently be de-notified.
"Decision of Election Tribunal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944287
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decision of Election Tribunal"
2004 C L C 1922
MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, (UNION COUNCIL No.49, NARHAL) DISTRICT KHANEWAL and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1983 S C M R 64
IRSHAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUL MAJEED AND 3 Others-Respondents
Court: - Ss. 24 & 24-A read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-- Writ petition challenging decision of Election Tribunal dismissed by High Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction for reason of findings of fact arrived at by Tribunal being conclusive and impugned order being not without lawful authority-Contended before Supreme Court that Election Tribunal misread evidence but no misreading pointed out -Counsel in fact trying to seek reappraisal of evidence-Reappraisal of evidence being not justified, dismissal of writ petition by High Court, held, unexceptionable-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3). Evidence.1988 S C M R 450
KHAN WAJID NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus NASIR KHALIL and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1983 S C M R 615
MULAZIM HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2025 Peshawar 110
AKRAM KHAN DURRANI — Petitioner Versus Malik ADNAN KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1977 Peshawar 50
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB‑Appellant Versus CHAIRMAN, ELECTION TRIBUNAL AND GTHBRS‑ Respondents
Court: Per Shah Zaman Babar, J. Qaisar Khan, J. reluctantly concurring‑‑1993 C L C 1127
MU14AMMAD ABBAS ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Syed MUHAMMAD MEHDI ZAIDI ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 S C M R 1021
Haji ALAM SHER — Petitioner Versus Malik MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1998 Quetta 1
MUHAMMAD ASIM KURD alias GAILOO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Nawabzada MIR LASHKARI KHAN RAISANI
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 67‑‑‑Word "decision" as used in S.67(3), Representation of the People Act, 1976‑‑‑Connotation.‑‑Words and phrases.P L D 1966 (W
DIL MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, SIALKOT AND OTHERS Respondents
Court: High Court