1988 PLP 450 (SCMR)
KHAN WAJID NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus NASIR KHALIL and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 450 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | KHAN WAJID NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus NASIR KHALIL and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | (Both on appeals from the orders dated 22-12-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, passed in Writ Petitions Nos.1705 and 1710 of 1987, respectively)., Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 450 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (Both on appeals from the orders dated 22-12-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, passed in Writ Petitions Nos.1705 and 1710 of 1987, respectively)., Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 450 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 450 (SCMR) (KHAN WAJID NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus NASIR KHALIL and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Akram Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Qamaruddin Khan Meo, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in Civil Petition No.930 of 1987).
- Raja Muhammad Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate on Record for Respondents (in Civil Petition No.930 of 1987).
- Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbul Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in Civil Petition No.931 of 1987) .
- Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh.Salahyddin, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents (in Civil Petition No.931 of 1987).
- Date of hearing: 10th January, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts.185(3) & 199--Leave to appeal sought from interim orders of High Court made during pendency of writ petitions arising out of decisions of Election Tribunals--No case for interference by Supreme Court made out--High Court, however, asked to dispose of petitions in a week commencing from 16-1-1988.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--In these two petitions leave to appeal is being sought from the interim orders of a Division Bench of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, made during the pendency of the writ petitions arising out of the decisions of the Election Tribunals. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, we A do not think that any case for interference by this Court has been made out. The High Court is however requested to dispose of the petitions in the week commencing from 16-1-1988. S.Q./W-16/S. Order accordingly.