Interview by Board

Interview was subjective test and it was not possible for a court of law to substitute its own opinion for that of Interview Board, in order to give relief to the candidate

What had transpired at interview and what persuaded one member of the Board to award him 50 marks was something which a court of law was not equipped to probe

High Court could not substitute its own opinion with that of Interview Board

If any mala fide or bias or for that matter error of judgment were floating on the surface of record, High Court would have intervened, as courts of law were more familiar with such improprieties rather than dilating into question of fitness of any candidate for a particular post, which was subjective matter and could at the best be assessed by functionaries who were entrusted with such responsibility

Supreme Court declined to interfere with the result of candidate declared by Public Service Commission

Petition was dismissed.