Home Maxims & Terms Award challenged partially meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Award challenged partially

Award challenged partially legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 CLD 132 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 17 & 30Award challenged partiallyEffect

Undisputed portion of award would be liable to be made rule of court straightaway, while objections regarding its disputed portion could be heard and decided according to law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Award challenged partially", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944346

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Award challenged partially"

CLD 2014
2013-October-21

2014 C L D 132

ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Industries, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 1959
18th May 1959

P L D 1959 (W

SUMAR‑Appellant Versus MESSRS BRIGSTOCKS EDULJI & Co.‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1982
Regular First Appeal No. 77 of 1982, decided on 30th May, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 752

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB AND 4 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Court: invoking doctrine of partial pre‑emption.‑EstoppeJ.
PLD 2005
Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2000, decided on 12th October, 2004.

P L D 2005 Peshawar 62

Mst. KHANUM JEE‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2004
2003-November-18

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 185

ALI MUHAMMAD MIRZA and others — Appellants Versus Mst. SARDARAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC 1992
Appeal No. WCH 1 of 1991, decided on 18th August, 1991.

1992 P L C 348

Messrs SAFURA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, S.I.T.E., KOTRI, DISTRICT JAMSHORO Versus NAIK MUHAMMAD and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
CLC 2017
2017-March-2

2017 C L C 952

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and others — Appellants Versus LILLEY INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 1983
Regular First Appeal No. 142 of 1976, decided on 3rd April, 1983.

P L D 1983 Peshawar 147

Haji AMIR AND 5 OTHERS — ‑Appellants Versus N.‑W. F. PROVINCE THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND 2 OTHERS‑ — Respondents

Court: -‑‑ S. 54‑--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S: 96‑Acquisition of land--- Rates of compensation---Chari and Chahi type of land‑Amount fixed in award but appellants demanding rate awarded in some other case‑ Appellants of their own having claimed rate as given in award as compensation for their land, held, estopped to go out of their own pleadings and statement given in Court‑Appellants declared to be entitled to compensation at rate fixed in award.‑Compensation.
PLC 1971
Appeal from Original Order No. 25 of 1968, decided on 24th _March 1970.

1971 PLC 89

KHAN-Appellant Versus CHAIRMAN, EAST PAKISTAN ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND

Court: Dacca (Pakistan)
CLD 2025
2025-May-26

2025 C L D 1517

HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED through authorized signatory — Appellant Versus PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT SIALKOT and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore