Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Divergent opinions meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Divergent opinions

Divergent opinions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PCrLJ 396 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 497 & 173BailInvestigations qua participation of accused in the offenceDivergent opinionsRelevancyAccused initially declared as innocent by investigating officerSubsequent investigation finding accused involved in the offenceEffect

Such divergent opinions of investigating officers about alleged participation of accused in the offence were relevant for consideration for bail plea of accused.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Divergent opinions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944863

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Divergent opinions"

PCRLJ 2014
2012-November-8

2014 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SAEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1990
9th September 1989

1990 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2008
Civil Review Petition No.390 of 2001, decided on 17th May, 2005.

2008 S C M R 733

MIAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SABIR and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2002
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.133 of 2001 in Criminal Review Petition No.Nil of 2001 in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.232 of 2000, decided on 6th June, 2001.

2002 S C M R 442

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus IMTIAZ BEGUM and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2025
S.T.R. No.41 of 2024, decided on 29th April, 2025.

2025 P T D 932

RUKSHANDA ASAD Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others

Court: Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench)
MLD 1997
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 231‑B of 1997, decided on 14th May, 1997.

1997 M L D 2989

MEHMOOD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2007
2007-June-8

P L D 2007 Federal Shariat Court 1

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ and another — Petitioners Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2011
2011-March-11

2011 M L D 1051

QAISAR ABBASS and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2005
N/A

2005 P T D 2340

NATIONAL SECURITY COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 1999
---- Cross-cases arising out of the same incident---Procedure detailed. When there are cross/counter-cases arising out of the same incident, it is incumbent upon the Court that both cases be tried by the same Judge side by side. The judgment is not to be pronounced until and unless both cases are completed. After completion of both the cases, Court has to keep the evidence in juxtaposition before delivering the judgment. However, facts/testimony of witnesses of one case cannot be acted upon in another case and each case is to be decided on the basis of evidence brought by the parties on record in that case. It is a rule of law as well as propriety and prudence for the safe dispensation of justice. By announcing the judgment together there will be no conflict of opinion.

1999 Y L R 1616

GHULAM MUSTAFA and 9 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library