Apprehensions
Apprehensions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Baseless apprehensions provide no cause of action and or ground for filing of Constitutional petition.
"Apprehensions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945122
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Apprehensions"
P L D 1964 Supreme Court 173
Mst. HUSSAIN JAN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus Mst. ASMAT BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents
Court: ---‑ Gift ‑ Marzul maut (death illness) Considerations for establishing‑Apprehension of fast approaching death‑Every case to be decided on own facts‑Whether donor's failure to attend to ordinary avocations an essential for establishing marzul maut‑Whether serious malady continuing over a long time cannot be described as death illness‑Principle of Muhammadan Law to be kept in view‑Considerations, other than such principle, set down in decided cases only matters of evidence‑T. B. patient dying 13 days after making gift.P L D 1990 Supreme Court 705
DAUD 10BAL PERVAIZ and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent.
Court:1993 P Cr
MUHAMMAD MALIK — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1992 C L C 1469
IFTIKHAR AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 M L D 4983
SHER AFZAL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi2022 M L D 1803
ALL RESIDENTS OF KATISHU through Representatives and another — Petitioners Versus AHLIYAN MEHDI ABAD through Representative — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1989 M L D 1510
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MADRAS — Appellant Versus MUNUSWAMY MUDALIAR and others — Respondents.
Court: Supreme Court of India1970 P Cr
MADAR SARDAR‑Petitioner Versus KINU GAZI AND 7 OTHERS‑Opposite‑Parties
Court: High Court DhacaP L D 1976 Lahore 598
SHAHID AZIZI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent'
Court: ‑‑ S. 526‑Transfer of case‑Considerations to be kept in view Reasonable apprehension in mind of accused that fair and impartial trial or inquiry cannot be had before Court where case pending Case should be transferred to some other Court‑ Reasonable appre hension, what is‑Must be decided with reference to incidents of case and surrounding circumstances‑Actual bias in mind of Court not necessary for purposts of S. 526.‑Transfer of criminal cases.P L D 1967 Dacca 305
ABDUL HUQ alias ABDUL HUQ MUNSHI AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL MATLEB‑Opposite‑Party
Court: