1993 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD MALIK — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1993 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD MALIK — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD MALIK — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ata Ullah Mirza for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 526
Law requires transfer of a case if reasonable apprehension of not getting a fair trial at the hands of Trial Court exists in the litigant's mind
Word "reasonable" denotes that the material should be of such a character which would satisfy the objective test that a person after going through such material must come to the conclusion that the apprehension is well-founded.
S. 526
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/34
Transfer of case-- Complainant had not given the date, time or other information about any incident leading to the inference that Trial Court had some bias in its mind
Perceived apprehensions were never good grounds for the transfer of a criminal case
Transfer application was dismissed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S. 526
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/34
Transfer of case-- Complainant had not given the date, time or other information about any incident leading to the inference that Trial Court had some bias in its mind
Perceived apprehensions were never good grounds for the transfer of a criminal case
Transfer application was dismissed in circumstances. Ata Ullah Mirza for Petitioner. This is a petition under section 526, Cr.P.C. for the transfer of a complaint case titled as "Muhammad Malik v. Muhammad Farooq etc.", under section 324/34, P.P.C. from the Court of Senior Civil Judge/ Magistrate Section 30, Toba Tek Singh to some other Court of competent jurisdiction.
2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of this petition are that the petitioner instituted a private complaint under section 324/34, P.P.C. against respondents Nos.l and 2 in the Court of learned Magistrate, Gojra, District Toba Tek Singh on 8-4-1992: Later on, this case was transferred to the file of learned Senior Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Toba Tek Singh where at present, the same is pending.
3. The petitioner seeks transfer of this case on the ground that he has lost faith for the impartiality of the Court due to certain observations made by the Court during the course of proceedings. The second ground for transfer, is that the respondents are influential persons and the petitioner fears that he may not be able to get a fair trial at the hands of the learned trial Court and has invoked the applicability of the principle of law that justice should not only be done but should be seemed to be done.
4. I have heard the learned counsel at length in support of the grounds mentioned above.
5. I find, nowhere, the learned counsel has given any time and date of the incident which has created this apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that he will not get a fair trial at the hands of the learned trial Magistrate. The law requires that a case' should be transferred if there are reasonable apprehensions in the mind of the litigant that he is not going to get a fair trial at the hands of the learned trial Court, the word "reasonable' denotes that the material should be of such a character which would satisfy the objective test that a person after going through that material must come to the conclusion that the apprehensions are well-founded.
6. In the present case, as the petitioner has not given the date, time or other information which could lead to this inference that there is some bias in the mind of the learned Judge, the perceived apprehensions are never good grounds for the transfer of a criminal case.
7. For the foregoing reasons, there is no force in this petition, which is dismissed in limine. N.H.Q./M-940/L Petition dismissed.