Compensation allowance
Compensation allowance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners having B.Tech. (Hons.) degree claimed for special compensation allowance as admissible to employees having Engineering degrees
Petitioners possessing B.Tech. (Hons.) degrees were not allowed compensation allowance as their degrees were not recognized by Pakistan Engineering Council equivalent to B.E./B.Sc. Engineering degree
Contention of the petitioners was that Higher Education Commission has declared B.Tech (Hons.) degree equivalent to B.E./B.Sc. Engineering and as such they were entitled to receive special compensation allowance
Validity
Higher Education Commission had the sole authority for determination of equivalency not only with regard to engineering qualification but in other disciplines as well
Pakistan Engineering Council only regulates affairs of Engineers
Higher Education Commission having sanctity of law had rightly found that B.Tech (Hons.) and B.E./B.Sc. Engineering though two distinct disciplines of knowledge in the field of engineering and technology but could be considered parallel to each and at par for the purpose of grades, pay, promotions and other benefits
Petitioners having B.Tech (Hons) degrees were entitled to benefit of special compensation allowance as admissible to graduate engineers
Employees/petitioners having B.Tech. (Hons.) Degrees had been eligible for further grades, promotion, pay/increments as well as other job benefits and allowances as given to engineers holding B.E./B.Sc. degrees
Constitutional petition was allowed.
"Compensation allowance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945336
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Compensation allowance"
2014 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD TEJA and 10 others Versus CHAIRMAN TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING AUTHORITY, LAHORE and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court1977 P L C 349
DIAMOND ICE FACTORY Versus SHER BANG
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind2009 M L D 860
AMIR KHAN AFRIDI and 6 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Collector Land Acquisition and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2014 P T D 997
C.I.R. ZONE-I, R.T.O., SIALKOT Versus Messrs ALBA ENGINEERING COMPANY, DASKA
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate TribunalP L D 1965 Dacca 400
JATISH CH. BHADURI‑Petitioner Versus KHIRODE NATH KUNDA AND OTHERS — Opposite‑Parties
Court:P L D 1959 W
MUHAMMAD SHAM‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID KHAN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 2013 Peshawar 1
Mst. HUSSAN JAMALA and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PUKHTUNKHWA through Secretary, Home and Tribal Affairs, Peshawar — Respondent
Court: High Court1979 P L C 166
MESSRS SIND FLOUR MILL Co. LTD. Versus Mst. KARIMA
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind2001 S C M R 1859
PROJECT DIRECTOR, GSC NTDC, WAPDA, MULTAN and others‑‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ASIF NADEEM and other‑‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2006 M L D 697
KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION through Secretary — Appellant Versus AISHA KANWAL and 3 others-Respondents
Court: Karachi