Collective Bargaining Unit
Collective Bargaining Unit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Applicant Trade Union sought declaration of all establishments of the Bank (employer) as one Collective Bargaining Unit all over the country
Certain documents filed by applicant in support of its claim, had indicated that the Union was registered with the National Industrial Relations Commission as Industry-wise Trade Union
Entire establishment of Bank was controlled and managed by one party; balance sheet, profit and loss of the entire establishment of Bank was the same, which was running its business throughout Pakistan, having its Head Office at Karachi
Bank had its more than 1400 branches in all the four provinces as well as Islamabad Capital Territory
Bank was, in circumstances, a Trans-provincial establishment in terms of S.2(xxxii) of Industrial Relations Act, 2012
Registration of unions of the Bank at Provincial level, in circumstances, was unlawful and contrary to the spirit of Industrial Relations Act, 2012, which had overriding effect in terms of S.87 thereof
One Collective Bargaining Unit in the establishment of the Bank had been working even when there was no law of concept of 'Trans-provincial' establishment
After legislation of Industrial Relations Act, 2012, it was imperative that mushroom growth of unions at provincial level was curtailed in order to avoid non-uniformity of terms and conditions of employment
Services of the workers were transferable to other provinces as well
Both under the law as well as the consistent decisions of superior Courts there could not be more than one Collective Bargaining Agent in the establishment or group of establishments on the basis of certificate of National Industrial Commission, on all Pakistan basis; and the certificate of Collective Bargaining Agent, issued by Provincial Registrar Trade Unions giving the status of Provincially registered trade union as Collective Bargaining Agent was illegal and without lawful authority
All the provincially registered trade unions functioning in any Province, were directed by National Industrial Commission to amend their constitution, including membership in more than one province; and elevate their status as Industry-wise Trade Union within a period of ninety days, failing which registration of union would be cancelled
Entire establishment of Bank, was determined by the Commission as one Collective Bargaining Unit for a period of five years to be continued for such period until a fresh Collective Bargaining Unit was determined by the Commission, in circumstances.
"Collective Bargaining Unit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945471
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Collective Bargaining Unit"
2007 P L C 127
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN STAFF UNION through Secretary-General and President Versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS (SINDH) KARACHI and 9 others
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission1989 P L C 536
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN CLASS IV EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind2002 P L C 145
MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. Versus REGISTRAR, INDUSTRY-WISE TRADE UNION and others
Court: Karachi High Court1993 P L C 273
MA. BAQI KHAN Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, through Chairman, Islamabad and 5 others
Court: Karachi High Court1984 P L C 1608
UNION (REGD.) Versus ALL-PAKISTAN POSTAL EMPLOYEES UNION AND 6 OTHERS.
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission1991 P L C 651
SUI GAS EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION and 4 others
Court: Karachi High Court2007NIRC2211
DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD. Through Resident/General Secretary and another Versus NATIONAL LABOUR UNION DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Court: National Industrial Relations CommissionP L D 1984 Karachi 292
MEssRs JANG PUBLICATIONS LTD.‑Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, SIND AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑ Bar of jurisdiction by "implication" would be permissible only if legislative intent of framers of law cannot be_ spelled out from provision of statute itself.‑Interpretation of statutes.1995 P L C 420
ALL PAKISTAN POSTMAN AND LOWER GRADE STAFF UNION through its President Versus ALL PAKISTAN POSTAL EMPLOYEES' UNION and 3 others
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission1995 P L C 217
CENTRAL LABOUR UNION, THREE STARS HOSIERY MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN Versus Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID, CHIEF EXECUTIVE and 8 others
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission