PLC 1995

1995 PLP 217 (PLC)

CENTRAL LABOUR UNION, THREE STARS HOSIERY MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN Versus Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID, CHIEF EXECUTIVE and 8 others

Jurisdiction / Court
National Industrial Relations Commission
Decided Date
Case No. 19(4) of 1994, decided on 28th November, 1994.
Honorable Judges
Gohar Yaqoob Yousaf Zai, Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1995 PLP 217 (PLC)
Forum / Court National Industrial Relations Commission
Bench Members Gohar Yaqoob Yousaf Zai, Member
Parties CENTRAL LABOUR UNION, THREE STARS HOSIERY MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN Versus Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID, CHIEF EXECUTIVE and 8 others
Primary Law Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 217 (PLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 217 (PLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: Gohar Yaqoob Yousaf Zai, Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 217 (PLC) (CENTRAL LABOUR UNION, THREE STARS HOSIERY MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN Versus Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID, CHIEF EXECUTIVE and 8 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S. 22‑EE‑‑‑Determination of collective bargaining unit‑‑‑Establishment which belonged to same employer and was of same industry, had five different units and total number of employees of each establishment was 691, but no other registered union existed in those five different units of establishment‑‑ Interest of employees employed in establishment, being same, it was necessary, just and feasible to determine all five units including all employees as one establishment, especially when none of employers had objected to determination of one Collective Bargaining Unit thereof‑‑‑Commission declared and determined five units of the establishment as one Collective Bargaining Unit in circumstances. Hafiz Muhammad Younus, Representative for Applicant.

Judgment & Decree

137

2. Three Stars Hosiery Mills (Pvt.) Limited, 10‑A, Industrial Estate; Multan 211

3. Three Stars Hosiery Mills (Pvt.) Limited, Hasan Parwana Colony, Multan 153

4. Three Stars Hosiery Mills (Pvt.) Limited, Milat Road, Faisalabad 123

5. Three Stars Hosiery Mills (Pvt.) RCD Road, Karachi 67 Total: 691 The total number of employees of the establishment comes to 691 but as admitted by all the respondents there is no other registered union in the five different units of the establishment. The interest of workmen employed in the Establishment belonging to the same employer and the same Industry is the same and it is necessary just and feasible to determine all the five different units including all the employees as one Establishment. Specifically when none of the respondents have objected to determination of one Collective Bargaining Unit, therefore, I feel no hesitation. in declaring and in determination of 5 Units of the petitioners establishment as one CBU. There shall be a determination of CBA in the CBU after the expiry of the term of the CBA ship of respondents are directed to amend their constitution in accordance with the orders of this Court and get themselves registered with Commission and open their membership to all the workmen employed in the establishment. A time period of two months is granted to the locally registered trade unions to get themselves registered with the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC). This order shall remain in force for a period of five years, if not changed before in accordance with the provisions of law, from the date of passing of this order after which fresh application should be made if material circumstances are changed. Fresh applications for holding the secret Ballot under section 22 of the IRO, 1969 would not be entertained within a period of two months of the date of passing this order. H.B.T./1034/NIRC Order accordingly.