Direct recruitment
Direct recruitment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner questioned the appointment of a lawyer against the post of Secretary Law, Justice and Human Rights Division of government of Pakistan on the ground that the said post was to be filled through promotion and not otherwise
Validity
Post of Secretary Law and Justice was required to be held by a person having professional career and qualification in legal discipline
In case the post in question was assumingly be allowed to be filled amongst the persons holding the positions of BS-21 irrespective of their qualification of law, the same would not justify the descriptions and requisites attached with the said post
Law had not prohibited to fill up the said post through direct recruitment on contract basis
No one could be prevented to do an act which was not prohibited under any law
After implementation of judicial policy, the post of Secretary Law and Justice could only be filled through direct recruitment from amongst professional lawyers as had been done in the present case
Constitutional petition was dismissed.
"Direct recruitment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945474
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Direct recruitment"
1994SCMR1957
RUSTAM KHAN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1983 P L C (C
Syed MAHFOOZ ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND 75 OTHERS
Court: Service Tribunal Sind1971 P LC 31 [C
AND OTHRRS. Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF WESPAKISTAN,
Court: 1971 P LC 31 C.S.T1986SCMR 898
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR AND 4 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: Art. 212 (3)-Civil service-Seniority-Leave to appeal granted to examine whether Service Tribunal had correctly exercised its juris diction in so far as it ante-dated appointments of direct recruits to tithe when vacancies occurred or their selection was made, ignoring altogether date in which such recruits took over their appointment, and in assigning seniority, pay allowances according to such ante dated appointments.-Civil services.P L D 1958 (W
Superintendent of Police, Gujranwala. | Versus (1) THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, |
Court: High Court2010 P L C (C
BASHIR AHMED Versus NATIONAL COLLEGE OF ARTS through Principal, National College of Arts and another
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1990 Supreme Court 477
GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary, S&GAD, Quetta and others — Appellants Versus MARJAN KHAN and others — Respondents Civil Appeals Nos. 12-0, 13-0 and 14-0 of 1985, decided on 26th September, 1989.
Court:1971 P L C 146 [C
ABDUL HAFEEZ KHAN Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, P. W. R.,
Court: 1971 P L C 146 C.S.T.1996SCMR1297
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and 4 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ABUDL RASHID and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 S C M R 2258
IZHAR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan