Home Maxims & Terms Criminal investigation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Criminal investigation

Criminal investigation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PCrLJ 810 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
S. 156Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of High CourtCriminal investigationInterferenceScope

High Court cannot hear and adjudicate petition under Art. 199 of the Constitution like an appeal and replace its findings with that of the Court of first instance or the Court hearing the revision petition

All High Court has to do is to determine whether there is any error of law or of jurisdiction

No interference in investigation can be made by any Court except in certain circumstances.

2021 PCrLJ 293 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of High CourtCriminal investigationProsecution of accusedScope

High Court did not entertain Constitutional petitions challenging insertion or deletion of sections of P.P.C. or offence(s) by the Investigating Officer and could not allow requests for judicial review of the opinion/direction of the public prosecutor given to the police for such amendment, on the ground that error, if any, did not prejudice either party and could be rectified by Trial Court at time of framing of charge.

2018 PLD 903 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 154 & 173Criminal investigationArrest of accusedPrinciple

Arrest of accused, during investigation, is not incumbent upon the police officer, if otherwise investigation can be concluded

Police officer is not required to deprive a person of his liberty.

2015 PCrLJ 387 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 114Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 156Criminal investigationScope

Rule of estoppel has nothing to do with criminal investigation or proceedings.

2014 PLD 264 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss.42, 54, 56 (d) & (e)Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), S.5Suit for declaration and injunctionCriminal investigationRefusal of injunction

Plaintiff assailed notices issued by Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to Habib Bank Limited in furtherance of inquiry that certain immovable properties of someone had been fraudulently offered by two persons to various banks for obtaining loans against said properties in favour of plaintiff's company

Validity

Defendants were officers of FIA established under Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 and were fully competent to inquire into fraud committed by different persons in obtaining loans from banking institutions

One of the defendants was posted in commercial banks' circle and it was within the purview of his duty to inquire into and investigate complaint registered, numbered and marked to him in terms of S.5 of Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974

Remedy was quashment, if made out and not simple declaration and decree prohibiting public functionaries from performing their duties within the four corners of law

Suit was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Criminal investigation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945615

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Criminal investigation"

PCRLJ 2004
2003-October-2

2004 P Cr

Mst. AFSHAN PERVEEN — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION QUTABPUR, MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2009
N/A

2009 M L D 25

RASHID MIRZA — Petitioner Versus REGIONAL DIRECTOR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2015
2013-July-31

2015 P Cr

Sheikh KHALID MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2000
Writ Petition No.2112 of 1997, decided on 2nd February, 2000.

2000 Y L R 47

Mst. NASEEM BIBI — Petitioner Versus SUB-REGISTRAR/M.I.C., LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No. 332 of 1986, decided on 10th January, 1989.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 145

BYRAM D. AVAR1 and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE and 4 others‑‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1999
1999-February-3

1999 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SHAFI and 3 others — Petitioners Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, UGGOKI, TEHSIL

Court: Lahore
YLR 2013
Civil Revision No.207 of 2004, decided on 15th October, 2010.

2013 Y L R 484

ASGHAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2018
Criminal Petition No. 100 of 2017, decided on 15th March, 2018.

2018 S C M R 791

AYESHA BIBI — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2002
Writ Petition No.20652 of 2001, decided on 21st November, 2001.

2002 M L D 1379

MUNIR AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Toba Tek Singh and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1950
Constitutional Criminal Appeal No 1 of 1949 dated the 23rd May, 1950, decided at Lahore, on 24th February, 1949.

P L D 1950 F

Maulvi MUHAMMAD ALI‑ — Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent

Court: