Home Maxims & Terms Vires of a statute meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Vires of a statute

Vires of a statute legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 PLD 641 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Applicability and scopeVires of a statuteConflicting judgments of two High Courts

In case of conflicting decisions on the vires of a legislative enactment of two High Courts, when decision of one remained unchallenged in the hierarchy as no appeal was preferred and the other was challenged before the Supreme Court, then the verdict of the High Court that went unchallenged, which was in conflict with the final decision of the Supreme Court had to be treated as outmoded and no longer executable

Such a situation warranted departure from the doctrine of res judicata.

2015 CLC 22 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 189 & 199Vires of a statuteConstitutional petition filed before the High Court challenging vires of a statuteStatute already declared as ultra vires the Constitution by the Supreme Court

High Court in such circumstances would be left with no option but to follow the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in view of Art.189 of the Constitution.

2014 PLD 531 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Law or provision of law not in conformity with the constitutional provisions

Court could declare such law or provision of law as ultra vires of the Constitution, and could issue appropriate directions to the Government to bring the law in conformity with constitutional provisions.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Vires of a statute", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945625

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Vires of a statute"

MLD 1990
Constitutional Petition No.D‑O60 of 1982, decided on 7th October, 1989.

1990 M L D 305

SHAHMURAD SUGAR MILLS Ltd.‑‑Petitioner Versus THE UNION COUNCIL, JHOKE SHARIF and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 1999
Civil Petitions Nos.D‑1980 and D‑1986 of 1997, decided on 12th January, 1999.

1999 Y L R 1984

NAZRUL HASSAN SIDDIQUI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 2000
Civil Petitions Nos.D-1980 and D-1986 of 1997, decided on 12th January 1999.

2000 P L C (C

NAZRUL HASSAN SIDDIQUI and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 2001
Appeals Nos.609-R, 645-R and 704-R of 1997, decided on 28th January, 1998.

2001 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and 2 others Versus THE SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION and 6 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
MLD 2026
other or narrower grounds, the Court will abstain from deciding the constitutional question;

2026 M L D 1

Jhelum Homoeopathic medical college, jhelum, through its Principal — Petitioner Versus Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination, Government of Pakistan and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
SCMR 2004
Civil Petitions Nos.1091, 1092, 1106, 1116 to 1118 of 2004, 1204 to 1213 of 2004, 1390-L to 1396-L, 1403-L, 1447-L, 1463-L, 1464-L, 1556-L, 1576-L to 1578-L, 1638, 1642-L, 1643-L; 1648-L, 1663-L, 1683-L, 1703-L, 1704-L, 1708-L, 1710-L, 1799-L, 1914-L, 1915-L, 1978-L, 2005-L, 2006-L, 2075-L of 2004 and 2198-L of 2004, decided on 16th July, 2004.

2004 S C M R 1903

GHULAM MUSTAFA INSARI and 48 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2015
N/A

2015 C L C 22

NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1999
Civil Petitions Nos. 155‑L, 457 and 458 of 1999, decided on 25th March, 1999.

1999 S C M R 1229

Islamabad and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus SHAUKAT ALI MIAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1983
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 16 of 1975, decided on 17-6-1976.

1983 S C M R 785

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE-Petitioner Versus THE MARKET COMMITTEE, TANDLIANWALA-Respondent

Court: - Chap. XVIII read with S. 4 and Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act (V of 1939), S. 27-Notification-Act of 1939 repealed by Act of 1975 but power of prohibiting establishment of market by Notification preserved in repealing Act-Erroneons reference to S. 27 of repealed Act as source of power under which Notification purported to have been issued-Held, would not nullify effect of such Notifica tion-Interpretation of statutes.
PLC(CS) 2018
N/A

2018 P L C (C

AWAIS SAEED and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court