Departmental representation
Departmental representation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellant although claimed that he had filed representation before the departmental authority which was turned down on 27-7-2018, whereafter appeal was filed before Service Tribunal on 09-8-2018, but it made no difference because the legal proposition that the civil servant is bound to prefer appeal to Service Tribunal within 120 days, reckoned from the date of filing departmental/appeal/review/representation is already settled
Service Tribunal had rightly dismissed the appeal on the point of limitation
Appeal was dismissed.
Authorities committed with High Court that if the representation was filed the same would be processed and decided in accordance with law by them expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing
Authorities were empowered under S. 6(3) of West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, to rescind detention order
High Court directed the petitioner to forward his representation to authorities to be considered and disposed of in accordance with law by authorities
Petition was dismissed in circumstances.
"Departmental representation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124945631
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Departmental representation"
2022 P L C (C
NATIONAL REFINERY LIMITED and another Versus Syed NIAZ AHMED
Court: Sindh High Court2016 P L C (C
KHIZAR HAYAT GONDAL Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE through Registrar
Court: Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal1981 S C M R 490
MALIK PARWEZ AKHTAR-Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS AND
Court: --- S. 4-Government servant-Appeal to Tribunal -- Presumption exists as to official acts being regularly performed-Departmental file containing a copy of reply sent to petitioner concerning his depart mental representation and such communication addressed to petitioner exactly on same address on which order of rejection sent hence no reason why earlier order should not have been received by Petitioner, held, ought to have, after expiry of statutory period of 90 days, filed an appeal within 30 days thereof before Tribunal and not having done so his appeal time barred and no case made out for interference by Supreme Court - Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212.-Civil services.2013PLC359
STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and another Versus Mirza KASHIF BAIG
Court: Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal2011 P L C (C
Syed DILAWAR MADAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1995SCMR4
MUHAMMAD AZAM MIRZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION through Chairman, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1992 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD SAEED, Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2004 P L C (C
Prof. (R.) NADEEM‑HUSSAIN SAIYID Versus GOVERNOR, PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through The Secretary, Services And General Administration Department, Government of Punjab, Lahore and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2017 P L C (C
Mst. SADIA MASOOD Versus PRIME MINISTER OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD through Secretary, Government of Pakistan and another
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2008 P L C (C
ATHAR NAVEED Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, BAHAWALPUR RANGE and others
Court: Punjab Service Tribunal