Claim for compensation
Claim for compensation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial Court returned the plaint for presentation in proper forum but Appellate Court remanded the case for decision on merits
Validity
Previously vendor from whom plaintiffs derived rights had litigated for the relief, in which she failed
Plaintiffs' case was hit by the principle of res judicata
Plaintiffs had claimed share in the forests and Shamilat lands wherein jurisdiction of Collector land acquisition was ousted
Collector land acquisition had limited jurisdiction with regard to compensation only
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Claim for compensation-Party receiving advantage-Bound to restore it to other party-Person claiming compensation is bound to prove that other party received advantage under contract.
"Claim for compensation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946408
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Claim for compensation"
2008 P T D 689
Messrs GOJRA WEAVING FACTORY, TOBA TEK SINGH Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2004 Y L R 915
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Deputy Commissioner, Faisalabad and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1971 S C M R 626
AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus H. H. AHMED‑Respondent
Court: High Court2021 C L C 915
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HIGHWAYS DIVISION MORO and 4 others — Applicants Versus NAZEER AHMED and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)P L D 1968 Karachi 374
MESSERS INDUS GLASS WORKS LTD.‑ — Appellant Versus SAFIRUDDIN‑Respondent
Court: Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), S. 10(1), proviso‑"Sufficient clause"‑ Workman re‑employed by same employer on same terms and conditions after accident--Workman, held, had sufficient cause for not instituting compensa tion proceedings within prescribed period‑Abdul Matin v. Bidesi Rajwar A I R 1939 Pat. 181 dissented from.1973
THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, P. W. R., QUETTA Versus MIAN MUHAMMAD
Court: QuettaP L D 2010 Supreme Court 976
MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJID and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1970 Karachi 216
KARACHI‑Appellant Versus THB KARACHI PARSI CO‑OPERATIVE HOUSING
Court:1990 SCMR 76
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑Appellant Versus NAZIR Al‑IMAD CHAUDHRY‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court2001 C L C 227
through Secretary‑‑‑Appellant Versus SAGHIR AHMAD ANSARI and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi