Family arrangement
Family arrangement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Family arrangement-Exchange of Property entered into by two brothers-Whether binding on minor sons of one of them. If there was a genuine family dispute and the compromise leading to an exchange of property arrived at was a fair one and for the benefit of the family as a whole, it was binding on the minor sons of one of the parties to compromise.
"Family arrangement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946675
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Family arrangement"
P L D 1967 Dacca 692
RAMJAN ALI MISTRIS alias HAJI RAMJAN Appellant Versus SHAMSUL HUQ AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:1998 P T D 2207
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Mrs. BIBIJAN BEGUM
Court: 221 I T R 8361999 Y L R 340
QAYYUM KHAN and 19 others — Petitioners Versus ZUMARAD KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 S C M R 1984
BASHIR AHMED (deceased) through his L.Rs. and others — Appellants Versus NAZIR AHMAD and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1969 Karachi 563
Mst. SUBHAN BIBI AND ANOTHER‑ — Appellants Versus Mst. MUSARRAT JABEEN AND OTHERS — ‑Respondents
Court: Alienation‑De facto guardian ---Cannot transfer right or interest in property of minor‑Family arrangement by mother to partition land falling to share of her minor children, held, illegal‑Ameer Hassan v. Muhammad Ejaz Hussain A I R 1929 Oudh 134 dissented from.P L D 1957 (W
MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus DITTA and others‑Plaintiffs‑Defendants‑Respondents
Court: High Court1986 S C M R 775
GHULAM RASUL KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus Mst. JINDAN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2002 M L D 1419
MUHAMMAD SALEEM and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. RASOOL FATIMA and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1998 PTD 328
OF WEALTH TAX/COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX Versus S.M.M. MUTHAPPA CHETTIAR
Court: 223 I T R 515P L D 1976 Karachi 109
Before 1. Mahmud, J Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court