Accessibility on merit
Accessibility on merit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners assailed letter No. S. O-I(I-1)1/15/2011/4219-26, dated 25-2-12, issued by Balochistan government, whereby procedure was laid down to distribute seats for minor diplomas and major diplomas in Postgraduate Medical Institute at Quetta
Validity
Reserving seats in the Institute for petitioners belonging to specific Divisions contravened Arts. 22(3)(b), 25(1) & 37(c) of the Constitution
Provisions of Art.8 of the Constitution stipulated that State would not make any law which could take away or abridged 41,ie rights so conferred (Fundamental Rights) and any law made in contravention of said clause (8(2)) to the extent of such contravention was void
Letter assailed by petitioners did not have even the status of law, violated Constitution of Pakistan and therefore, was ultra vires the Constitution
Petition was maintainable and High Court whilst exercising jurisdiction under Art.199 of the Constitution could refrain official respondents from granting admission to the Institute on the basis of letter in question that had allocated seats to different Divisions of Quetta city, which was neither Charter of the Institute, Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations or the Constitution permitted
High Court declared that Letter in question and basis of granting admission on Divisional quota basis prescribed therein was ab initio void, illegal and ultra vires the Charter of the Institute, Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations and the Constitution, therefore, was set aside
High Court directed the authorities to admit petitioners to the Institute strictly on the basis of merit
Petition was allowed accordingly. Muhammad Akram v. Muhammad Salim PLD 1964 (WP) Lah. 490; Muhammad Niazi v. State PLD 2003 Kar. 536; Fiaqat Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2012 SC 224; Pakcom Limited v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2011 SC 44; Attiyya Bibi Khan v. Federation of Pakistan 2001 SCMR 1161; Muhammad Ikram v. Principal and Chairman Admission Committee 2014 MLD 1; Muhammad Ilyas v. Bahauddin Zakaria University 2005 SCMR 961; Muhammad Majeed v. Government of Pakistan PLD 2002 Lah. 290; Tufail Muhammad v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan PLD 1965 SC 269; Abdul Baqi v Muhammad Akram PLD 2003 SC 163; Muhammad Afaq v. Federal Public Service Commission 2001 CLC 2001 and 2003 CLC 18 ref.
"Accessibility on merit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946893
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accessibility on merit"
2023 P Cr
Malik AZMAT ULLAH — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior
Court: Lahore2013 P T D 2226
SOHAIL AMIN Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2017 Y L R 2423
SHARJEEL INAM — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2016 P Cr
FAWAD ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2026 Islamabad 118
ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary and another — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN INFORMATION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1954 Federal Court 243
STATE OF AMB (DARBAND) through NAWAB SIR MUHAMMAD FARID KHAN, RULER OF AMB STATE — Plaintiff . Versus (1) THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND
Court:P L D 1969 Karachi 60
Syed ALAM HUSSAIN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents
Court: S. 1(3) read with Government of India Act, 1935, S. 102 as amended by India (Proclamation of Emergency) Act, 1946 and Government of India (Second Amendment) Act, 1948 & S. 5 (bb) as amended by Governor‑General's Order (No. 6 of 1949) and Supplementary Instrument of Accession (Khairpur State) Sched. Entry No. 4‑Evacuee Laws of Pakistan, held, applicable to Khair pur State.P L D 2021 Supreme Court 595
JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA and others — Petitioners Versus The PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2025 Supreme Court 1043
ABDUL SALAM KHAN — Petitioner Versus Messrs BANK AL-HABIB LTD. and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1977 S C M R 287
Sheikh SHABBIR HUSSAIN (REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS)‑Appellant Versus ABDUL RAOOF AND OTHER-‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ O. XVI, r. 17‑Appea), abatement of‑Original appellant dying but application under O. XVI, r. 17 not made by deceased's legal representative within 90 days‑Appeal, held, abated.‑Abatement.