Absurdity of provision
Absurdity of provision legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Court can supply construction with a view to avoiding absurdity.
"Absurdity of provision", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947031
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Absurdity of provision"
2014 P T D (Trib
Messrs DEWAN FAROOQUE MOTORS LTD. Versus The COLLECTOR (APPEALS) and 2 others
Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal, KarachiP L D 1966 (W
MAJID KHAN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus MUJAHID KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) N.‑W. F. P. Pre‑emption Act (XIV of 1950), S. S(c) Words "measuring more than one kanal"‑Whether qualify immediate words "vacant site" or the word "house" as well-Whether it is obligatory on resident (minor or major) of village to occupy house in order to claim protection of S. 5(c)‑Farid Khan v. Khawaja Mir, etc. Civil Revision No. 144 of 19,,3 (unreported) overruled.2014 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal2004 P T D 1949
OLYMPIA SYNTHETIC Versus SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court2001 SCMR 103
KHALID QURESHI end 5 others — Petitioners Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED I.I. CHUNDRIGAR ROAD, KARACHI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2021 C L C 1968
SHAHZADA COLONEL SHARIF-UD-DIN and others — Petitioners Versus The SETTLEMENT OFFICER DISTRICT UPPER AND LOWER CHITRAL and others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)2022 P T D 1727
Messrs KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2022 S C M R 1943
Messrs KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD. — Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1954 Lahore 640
MALIK MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN and 2 others‑Respondents
Court:1998 P T D 987
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus BAKHEAR AHMED & CO.
Court: 221 I T R 574