Home Maxims & Terms Conjunctive meaning meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Conjunctive meaning

Conjunctive meaning legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 2016 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Fourth Sched. Part I, Entry No. 51Federal Legislative List"Taxes on mineral oil, natural gas and minerals for use in generation of nuclear energy"Word "and", interpretation ofConjunctive meaning

Plea that word "and" in Entry No.51 (Part I, Fourth Sched. to the Constitution) should be read as "or" for bringing out the true meaning of it as intended by the framers of the Constitution

Validity

By the use of "and" in between "natural gas" and "minerals" in Entry No.51 (Part I, Fourth Sched. to the Constitution), all the three items were to be read conjunctively with the words following them

In the said Entry "and" could have been substituted by "or" only if without the change absurd consequences would have followed

Restricting "mineral oil" or "natural gas" to their use in the generation of nuclear energy would not lead to any absurdity, thus Entry No.51 could only be accorded its natural meaning and the same should be read conjunctively.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Conjunctive meaning", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124947040

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conjunctive meaning"

PTD 2006
Customs Reference Application No.166 of 2005, decided on 14th June, 2006.

2006 P T D 2237

PAK SUZUKI MOTORS CO. LTD. through Senior General Manager (Corporate Planning & Logistics), Karachi Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Assistant Collector (Processing), Karachi

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. LYP‑229 of 1976, decided on 14th June, 1982.

1984 P L C 647

RIAZUL HAQ Versus LYALLPUR CHEMICAL & FERTILIZER FACTORY LTD., FAISALABAD

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PTD 2014
Civil Appeals Nos. 1540 - 1599 of 2013 and Civil Appeal No.21 of 2014, decided on 22nd August, 2014.

2014 P T D 2016

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Versus DURRANI CERAMICS and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2014
Civil Appeals Nos. 1540 - 1599 of 2013 and Civil Appeal No.21 of 2014, decided on 22nd August, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1630

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another — Appellants Versus DURRANI CERAMICS and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1978
Sales Tax Reference No. 26 of 1969, decided on 8th February 1978.

P L D 1998 Karachi 432,

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX‑Applicant Versus Messrs PREMIER MACHINERY WORKS, KARACHI — Respondent

Court: ‑‑ S. 7 read with Customs Notifications Nos. 14(e) dated 15‑31-954, items (s) 3c (PI) and 3.S.T. dated 153 1954‑Sales tax‑Exemption‑Technical words used in enactments‑To be interpreted in technical cease‑Conduit pipe‑Not a mechanical or electrical control sad transmission gear or mechanism adopted for we in conjunction with main machinery and not necessary for transmission of electrical energy but intended for reception of cables for distribution of electric energy‑Conduit pipe -Does not fall within item V of Schedule to Notification No. 14(e) hence not exempt from payment of sales to b virtue of Notification No: 3‑S. T.‑ Interprotation of statutes
PTD 1999
N/A

1999 P T D 2901

Messrs PAKISTAN SERVICES LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE 'C' (COS-1), KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC 1993
Appeal No. KAR‑203 of 1991, decided on 27th April, 1992.

1993 P L C 205

IQBAL AHMED KHAN Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, IST SINDH LABOUR COURT and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 2005
F.A.O. No. 153 of 2002, decided on 1st July, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

Dr. ANJUM SYED Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 2002
Writ Petition No. 187 of 19.95, decided on 18th September, 2001.

2002 C L C 54

Master SAID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Ch. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1970
Appeal No. HYD: 148 of 1969, decided on 19th May 1969.

1970 P L C 212

SAIFUL KABIR Versus THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan