Home Maxims & Terms Computing period of limitation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Computing period of limitation

Computing period of limitation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLC 592 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 4Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.114 & 151Suit, filing ofPeriod of LimitationExpiry on last working dayRecalling of judgmentSingle Judge of High Court dismissed the suit as it was barred by limitation

On application of plaintiff, the judgment was recalled by Single Judge of High Court on the ground that court was not assisted on behalf of plaintiff when judgment was passed as notification was not brought to the notice of the court, though the suit was filed on the first opening day of the court ail: plaintiff was entitled for the benefit of S.4 of the Limitation Act, 1908

Validity

If period of limitation was expiring on the day when the court was closed, the suit could be instituted, preferred or made on the day when the court reopened

Order passed by single Judge of High Court was correct in law and was unexceptionable and did not require any interference by Division Bench of High Court

Defendant failed to bring on record any illegality in the order passed by single Judge which could compel Division Bench of High Court to exercise any discretionary relief in favour of defendant

Intra court Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

2015 PLD 220 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 12(2)Computing period of limitationCertified copies, preparation ofPrinciple

If certified copy is prepared after proposed date given to applicant, Copying Agency under S.12(2) of Limitation Act, 1908, is bound by law to issue notice to the party for collection of certified copy.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Computing period of limitation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953496

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Computing period of limitation"

PLC(CS) 1992
Civil Appeal No. 18 of 1991, decided on 18th January, 1992.

1992 P L C (C

Ch. GHULAM NABI Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through

Court: Supreme Court (Azad J&K)
CLC 2003
N/A

2003 C L C 1764

ABDUL MAJEED KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUL QADEER — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1983
First Rent Appeal No. 6 of 1981, decided on 29th July, 1982.

P L D 1983 Karachi 417

M. A. QAYOOM-Appellant Versus Mst. ROSHAN SULTAN-Respondent

Court:
PLD 2010
2010-February-8

P L D 2010 Supreme Court 582

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1987
Regular first Appeal No. 127 of 1979, decided on 30th September, 1986.

PESHAWAR HIGH COURT

AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus DILBAR KHAN AND 8 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 1987
High Court Appeal No.22 of 1987, decided on 2nd April, 1987.

1987 M L D 2583(1)

SULTAN ALI and another — Appellants Versus MIRZA MOAZZAM BAIG — Respondent .

Court: Karachi
CLD 2005
N/A

2005 C L D 1705

ARSHAD AHMED and 2 others — Appellants Versus TRUST COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED through Manager — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLCN 2016
N/A

2016 C L C Note 66

Mehar GHULAM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HANEEF — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
SCMR 2002
Civil Petition No.839‑L. of 2002, decided on 10th April, 2002.

2002 S C M R 1554

FIDA HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM SARWAR‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2000
Civil Appeal No.932 bf 1993, decided on 7th October, 1999.

P L D 2000 Supreme Court 63

GHULAM NABI and 5 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus RASHID ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: