Computing period of limitation
Computing period of limitation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
On application of plaintiff, the judgment was recalled by Single Judge of High Court on the ground that court was not assisted on behalf of plaintiff when judgment was passed as notification was not brought to the notice of the court, though the suit was filed on the first opening day of the court ail: plaintiff was entitled for the benefit of S.4 of the Limitation Act, 1908
Validity
If period of limitation was expiring on the day when the court was closed, the suit could be instituted, preferred or made on the day when the court reopened
Order passed by single Judge of High Court was correct in law and was unexceptionable and did not require any interference by Division Bench of High Court
Defendant failed to bring on record any illegality in the order passed by single Judge which could compel Division Bench of High Court to exercise any discretionary relief in favour of defendant
Intra court Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
If certified copy is prepared after proposed date given to applicant, Copying Agency under S.12(2) of Limitation Act, 1908, is bound by law to issue notice to the party for collection of certified copy.
"Computing period of limitation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953496
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Computing period of limitation"
1992 P L C (C
Ch. GHULAM NABI Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through
Court: Supreme Court (Azad J&K)2003 C L C 1764
ABDUL MAJEED KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUL QADEER — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1983 Karachi 417
M. A. QAYOOM-Appellant Versus Mst. ROSHAN SULTAN-Respondent
Court:P L D 2010 Supreme Court 582
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanPESHAWAR HIGH COURT
AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus DILBAR KHAN AND 8 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:1987 M L D 2583(1)
SULTAN ALI and another — Appellants Versus MIRZA MOAZZAM BAIG — Respondent .
Court: Karachi2005 C L D 1705
ARSHAD AHMED and 2 others — Appellants Versus TRUST COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED through Manager — Respondent
Court: Lahore2016 C L C Note 66
Mehar GHULAM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HANEEF — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)2002 S C M R 1554
FIDA HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM SARWAR‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2000 Supreme Court 63
GHULAM NABI and 5 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus RASHID ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: