Home Maxims & Terms Condonation of deficiencies meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Condonation of deficiencies

Condonation of deficiencies legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 PLC(CS) 308 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 19Civil Service Regulations, Para. 423Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 & 212Constitutional petitionDeath of an employee having service of nine years and six monthsQualifying service for pensionary benefitsCondonation of deficienciesLeave on full pay or half payEffectBar of Art.212 of the ConstitutionApplicabilityEmployee died having service of nine years and six months

Plea of employee's heirs was that a deficiency of a period not exceeding six months in the qualifying service for pensionary benefits of an official should be deemed to have been condoned automatically

Validity

Qualifying service for pensionary benefits was ten years

Deficiency not exceeding six months in qualifying service for pensionary benefits of an official should be deemed to have been condoned automatically

Even the authority competent to sanction pension might condone the deficiency of more than six months and less than one year provided the official/civil servant died during service or retired prematurly under circumstances beyond his control

Sanction for condonation was not required in the present case as employee had completed more than nine years and six months service which was automatically condonable

Employee had availed leave either on full pay or on half pay which was countable towards his continuous service

Department had illegally deprived the heirs of deceased employee from their due pensionary benefits

Period of extraordinary leave should not be treated as qualified service for pension but only as a bridge between the period of qualifying service

Entire leave availed by the employee was either on full pay or half pay which could not be treated as extraordinary leave

Any interruption in service due to other reason might be condoned provided such interruption was not due to any fault or willful act of civil servant

Accounts Officer was bound to maintain the leave account of civil servant

Heirs of deceased employee did not fall within the definition of "civil servant" and bar of Art.212 of the Constitution would not be applicable against them

Sanctioned leave granted to the employee either on full pay or half pay had illegally and wrongly been treated as leave without pay

Deceased employee had rendered service for more than nine years and six months

Legal heirs of the deceased employee were entitled for the pensionary benefits

Department was directed to immediately grant family pension to the legal heirs of deceased employee

Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Condonation of deficiencies", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955259

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Condonation of deficiencies"

PLC(CS) 1993
Appeal No. 60(K) of 1990, decided on 5th August, 1992.

1993 P L C (C

ZIARAT GUL Versus MILITARY ACCOUNTANT‑GENERAL, RAWALPINDI and another

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1998
Appeal No.45(K) of 1996, decided on 17th February, 1997.

1998 P L C (C

ABDUL HAFEEZ SIDDIQI Versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS H.Q., LAHORE and another

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 2025
Writ Petition No. 1981 of 2024, decided on 30th June, 2025.

2025 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench)
SCMR 2009
Civil Petition No.359 of 2008, decided on 31st March, 2008.

2009 S C M R 769

SECRETARY FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN, EX-INSPECTOR, I.B., ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 1981
Writ Petition No. 12255 of 1980, decided on 29th June, 1981.

1981 P L C 529

AKHTAR HUSSAIN Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARGODHA AND 3 OTHERS

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1971
Writ Petition No. 1933 of 1968, decided on 20th April 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 843

Mst. FIRDOUS FATIMA‑Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE

Court:
CLC 2008
2008-February-22

2008 C L C 695

AYESHA IQBAL — Petitioner Versus BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2016
Writ Petition No.2393-P of 2013, decided on 6th May, 2015.

2016 P L C (C

Mst. RASHIDA KHATOON and 2 others Versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (MALE) and 3 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC(CS) 2005
N/A

2005 P L C (C

NASIR KHAN Versus CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH KARACHI and 13 others

Court: Sindh Service Tribunal
GBLR 2010
2010-October-7

2010 GBLR 432

In re S.M.Cs. Nos. 16 and 17 of 2010

Court: Supreme Appellate Court